Well, Well, Well

[A Quiet Monkfish]

Re: Well, Well, Well

Exactly.

Or the ref had played advantage or Robinson had scored the penalty at Huddersfield.

I have no reason to defend Morison whatsoever but a lot of people on here seem to be getting ahead of themselves after the last 2 games.

I haven't seen anything different in playing style these last couple of games other than we've managed to score a goal in each. This is Morison's squad, Morison's way of playing, but I suppose with no mention of bullying and Colwill, that's a positive.

[Ivortheengine]

Re: Well, Well, Well

It could so easily be 1 point out of 6 in those two games. Burnley took their foot off the gas as soon as they went in front. At that point most of the crowd were hoping it wasn’t’t going to be a pasting. However Bluebirds deserve credit for trying to do something ,as their opponents just sat back and invited the opposition to try to equalise. The inevitable happened much to everyone’s surprise. As for last night, when you get a chance to change a game with a penalty, you have to take it. Maybe the ref could have waited a few seconds before blowing the whistle, and then Rovers would have got on the scoresheet. It was to Hudsons good fortune that the penalty kick was a poor one. I could have saved it. Goals change games, so it’s too early to judge Hudson just yet.

[Bobby Dandruff]

Re: Well, Well, Well

It could so easily be 1 point out of 6 in those two games. Burnley took their foot off the gas as soon as they went in front. At that point most of the crowd were hoping it wasn’t’t going to be a pasting. However Bluebirds deserve credit for trying to do something ,as their opponents just sat back and invited the opposition to try to equalise. The inevitable happened much to everyone’s surprise. As for last night, when you get a chance to change a game with a penalty, you have to take it. Maybe the ref could have waited a few seconds before blowing the whistle, and then Rovers would have got on the scoresheet. It was to Hudsons good fortune that the penalty kick was a poor one. I could have saved it. Goals change games, so it’s too early to judge Hudson just yet.

Some sense! 👍

[Bobby Dandruff]

Re: Well, Well, Well

I haven't seen anything different in playing style these last couple of games other than we've managed to score a goal in each. This is Morison's squad, Morison's way of playing, but I suppose with no mention of bullying and Colwill, that's a positive.

EXACTLY.

Definitely not ‘fabulous’ or ‘great’. Yet anyway. Hopefully in time though.

[2b2bdoo]

Re: Well, Well, Well

It could so easily be 1 point out of 6 in those two games. Burnley took their foot off the gas as soon as they went in front. At that point most of the crowd were hoping it wasn’t’t going to be a pasting. However Bluebirds deserve credit for trying to do something ,as their opponents just sat back and invited the opposition to try to equalise. The inevitable happened much to everyone’s surprise. As for last night, when you get a chance to change a game with a penalty, you have to take it. Maybe the ref could have waited a few seconds before blowing the whistle, and then Rovers would have got on the scoresheet. It was to Hudsons good fortune that the penalty kick was a poor one. I could have saved it. Goals change games, so it’s too early to judge Hudson just yet.

That’s football though, you can make a case for most games it could have been this or that. At the end of the day it’s a good 4 points against play off teams.

Just as much as you can say we pushed Burnley back rather than they took their foot off the gas, it makes little difference.

It’s impossible to judge Hudson yet, I don’t want him as manager personally but im happy with the two games, not huge difference but small subtle ones. I don’t think much needed changing but let’s wait and see.

[BlueArmy 86]

Re: Well, Well, Well

Whats to day these performances wouldn’t have come under Morison? The groups gelling. Hudson has certainly benefited from the changes Morison made and the players he brought in.

[Ninja]

Re: Well, Well, Well

It could so easily be 1 point out of 6 in those two games. Burnley took their foot off the gas as soon as they went in front. At that point most of the crowd were hoping it wasn’t’t going to be a pasting. However Bluebirds deserve credit for trying to do something ,as their opponents just sat back and invited the opposition to try to equalise. The inevitable happened much to everyone’s surprise. As for last night, when you get a chance to change a game with a penalty, you have to take it. Maybe the ref could have waited a few seconds before blowing the whistle, and then Rovers would have got on the scoresheet. It was to Hudsons good fortune that the penalty kick was a poor one. I could have saved it. Goals change games, so it’s too early to judge Hudson just yet.

Come on Ivor, credit where it's due surely?
I won't sit here and claim we were spectacular, we weren't. There's absolutely room for improvement.
However, having said that, the last two games have been a marked improvement on anything Morison offered up in his ten attempts.
We attacked the goal and box more, made more runs, looked far more likely to make something happen.

Morison's gone, let's get on with it and give Hudson a chance.

I've watched almost every game this season, albeit admittedly via streams, but these last two are a definite step up.
I can't help but feel that had we played the way we did in the previous ten, we'd have probably lost both.

[Bobby Dandruff]

Re: Well, Well, Well

That’s football though, you can make a case for most games it could have been this or that. At the end of the day it’s a good 4 points against play off teams.

Just as much as you can say we pushed Burnley back rather than they took their foot off the gas, it makes little difference.

It’s impossible to judge Hudson yet, I don’t want him as manager personally but im happy with the two games, not huge difference but small subtle ones. I don’t think much needed changing but let’s wait and see.

I think that we are in agreement here.

What I find alarming is a number of people in the match thread saying that we were fabulous’ and that it was a ‘great’ performance (and there were plenty) all wanting Hudson appointed in the ‘Hudson In’ thread.

I’m glad that we won and there has been a modest upturn in performance levels but It feels like I was watching a different game.

Weird.

[Tuerto]

Re: Well, Well, Well

I think that we are in agreement here.

What I find alarming is a number of people in the match thread saying that we were fabulous’ and that it was a ‘great’ performance (and there were plenty) all wanting Hudson appointed in the ‘Hudson In’ thread.

I’m glad that we won and there has been a modest upturn in performance levels but It feels like I was watching a different game.

Weird.

Do you think that we looked more aggressive, more intensity, more of a willingness to get to the ball before Blackburn did and more desire to win the 2nd balls? I think that we did,Bob.

I get your reservations, there was still little happening around the penalty box and the way we gave away the penalty was poor, but to me, it looked sharper. Still work to do though.

[delmbox]

Re: Well, Well, Well

It could so easily be 1 point out of 6 in those two games. Burnley took their foot off the gas as soon as they went in front. At that point most of the crowd were hoping it wasn’t’t going to be a pasting. However Bluebirds deserve credit for trying to do something ,as their opponents just sat back and invited the opposition to try to equalise. The inevitable happened much to everyone’s surprise. As for last night, when you get a chance to change a game with a penalty, you have to take it. Maybe the ref could have waited a few seconds before blowing the whistle, and then Rovers would have got on the scoresheet. It was to Hudsons good fortune that the penalty kick was a poor one. I could have saved it. Goals change games, so it’s too early to judge Hudson just yet.

You make some fair points but at no point did I think Burnley were going to give us a pasting

[stan butler]

Re: Well, Well, Well

You make some fair points but at no point did I think Burnley were going to give us a pasting

Ivor the jack:hehe:

[Bobby Dandruff]

Re: Well, Well, Well

Do you think that we looked more aggressive, more intensity, more of a willingness to get to the ball before Blackburn did and more desire to win the 2nd balls? I think that we did,Bob.

I get your reservations, there was still little happening around the penalty box and the way we gave away the penalty was poor, but to me, it looked sharper. Still work to do though.

Yes a bit Dennis. I get that, but not to the extent that lots of other people were going on about how great were were. The limitations that you point out were there for everyone to see.

Maybe that is all that we can expect from Hudson having had limited time with the players. Just tweaking what Morison started.

[J R Hartley]

Re: Well, Well, Well

Whats to day these performances wouldn’t have come under Morison? The groups gelling. Hudson has certainly benefited from the changes Morison made and the players he brought in.

:hehe::hehe:

Hes not the messiah, hes a very naughty boy.

[fugsyphil]

Re: Well, Well, Well

Whats to day these performances wouldn’t have come under Morison? The groups gelling. Hudson has certainly benefited from the changes Morison made and the players he brought in.

Zero points on games where we conceded first under Morison says we don't get an equalizer v Burnley.

Only 1 girl scored (which didn't actually matter as it was a consolation v Luton) after the 50th minute under Morison also says a late winner v Blackburn is highly unlikely.

Whether Hudson has improved things much I guess we need a few away games to truly judge as it was the away performances that were pitiful under the old manager

[TWGL1]

Re: Well, Well, Well

:hehe::hehe:

Hes not the messiah, hes a very naughty boy.

As in what you have suggested or something else ?