Jack Grealish

[Citizen's Nephew]

Re: Jack Grealish

Yes he was. There are clearly others who agree. His smug smirking after playing dirty clearly got a few backs up.

Can't deny his ability, but he was a sly little shite back then.

As someone else has pointed out, he is the sort of player you'd be happy with if he played FOR you, rather than against you, and I can't disagree with that.

Just doing his job as a pro footballer. It was stirred up so badly he was attacked on the park by a fan.

[Trigger]

Re: Jack Grealish

Good on him.

Never thought of him as a particularly dirty player. Seemed to be someone due to his ability and importance to Villa that was usually on the receiving end.

[TWGL1]

Re: Jack Grealish

Yes he was. There are clearly others who agree. His smug smirking after playing dirty clearly got a few backs up.

Can't deny his ability, but he was a sly little shite back then.

As someone else has pointed out, he is the sort of player you'd be happy with if he played FOR you, rather than against you, and I can't disagree with that.

How was he Sly ? He was just playing within the rules

[NYCBlue]

Re: Jack Grealish

Decent player. Not top shelf. Sly. Diver.

Nice to hear that he's a good bloke. That's what's most important. :thumbup:

[superfeathers]

Re: Jack Grealish

Decent player. Not top shelf. Sly. Diver.

Nice to hear that he's a good bloke. That's what's most important. :thumbup:

I didn't notice this, i'd switched off by the time Grealish scored, but:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-manchester-63709932