Message to Tan and the board

[2b2bdoo]

Re: Message to Tan and the board

Critchley lol ,bet Tan is devastated. Are there any other managers available and suitable, maybe you can send him a list.

You would take him on Hudson? What’s he got 4 points in two away games and you’re mocking him on Hudsons latest.

[ferrari_andretti]

Re: Message to Tan and the board

I’m not sure anyone would want to manage us right now

[olderblue]

Re: Message to Tan and the board

There are dozens of managers out of work right now, who would relish the opportunity.
Forget about the high profile ones, like Dyche etc

All managers want to test themselves and although were hardly an attractive option atm, there would still be plenty of takers for the role, if Hudson was moved on

[Whisperer]

Re: Message to Tan and the board

So we got 3 window embargo then the next instalment will be due we could be looking at 9 windows knowing our luck.

[J R Hartley]

Re: Message to Tan and the board

So he's a more experienced first team coach but not manager.

Critchley a more experienced and successful manager.

By that logic Neil Harris is a more experienced and successful manager than Neil Critchley, let’s get him back.

[blue lewj]

Re: Message to Tan and the board

By that logic Neil Harris is a more experienced and successful manager than Neil Critchley, let’s get him back.

Critchley has a higher win percentage than Harris. Critchley is more experienced than Hudson too.

We need a change from Hudson was my point, but then you knew that.

[FormerlyJohnnyBreadhead]

Re: Message to Tan and the board

I repeatedly see this thrown around, "we need an experienced manager". It means nothing. Mick McCarthy is an experienced manager and, make no bones about it, he was dragging us into League 1.

I can reel off a dozen "experienced" managers that I wouldn't want anywhere near the club. It's such a lazy conclusion.

Focus on the reality: we've left 4 points on the pitch in the last 2 games, not because of Mark Hudson, but because our finishing is piss poor.

We could get Carlo Ancelotti through the door, but if your strikers repeatedly can't hit the target from 8 yards out, it doesn't matter.

[J R Hartley]

Re: Message to Tan and the board

Hudson hasn’t even been given a transfer window, he deserves that at least. Assuming we can get the embargo lifted.

When Morison was still working with Mcarthys squad people were saying can’t judge him until he’s had chance to bring some of his own
players in. Same should apply to Hudson.

Personally, I don’t think Hudson is the answer
long term. I would have liked to seen us take a risk with a foreign manager or an up and coming manager with a name. I said ages before he went to Boro I’d like to have seen Carrick here.

[blue lewj]

Re: Message to Tan and the board

Hudson hasn’t even been given a transfer window, he deserves that at least.

Sadly due to us messing about with the Sala money that will be in 2030.

[Hilts]

Re: Message to Tan and the board

I cant believe that after that shit show yesterday the suggestion of who Tan should have appointed was the man in charge of the shit opposition. Critchley ffs.🤣🤣🤣

[blue lewj]

Re: Message to Tan and the board

I cant believe that after that shit show yesterday the suggestion of who Tan should have appointed was the man in charge of the shit opposition. Critchley ffs.������

All ears on who you'd have in charge.

As usual just have little digs with very little constructive.

[Hilts]

Re: Message to Tan and the board

All ears on who you'd have in charge.

As usual just have little digs with very little constructive.

Under our current circumstances id stick with Hudson.

We have no money a shit squad and are under a transfer embargo.

I dont think any of that is Hudsons fault and by the looks of QPR your suggestion of Critchley would have meant more money wasted.

[blue lewj]

Re: Message to Tan and the board

Under our current circumstances id stick with Hudson.

We have no money a shit squad and are under a transfer embargo.

I dont think any of that is Hudsons fault and by the looks of QPR your suggestion of Critchley would have meant more money wasted.

He's been there two games.

He has 4 points. More than we have in our last 5 games.
I'd prefer Critchley.

[A Quiet Monkfish]

Re: Message to Tan and the board

Bristol City. Not having a great season are they - level on points with City. Allegedly a well-run club with attentive, on- the-job owners, excellent young players, shorn of all their over-the-hill players to the likes of us, and play some decent attacking football. Perennial play-off hopefuls most seasons until November. Yes, it feels like a club neglected by dis-interested owners, but the 1st thing to address is hitting the back of the net - how Hudson or any other manager tackles that is anyone's guess...

[The Lone Gunman]

Re: Message to Tan and the board

Bristol City. Not having a great season are they - level on points with City. Allegedly a well-run club with attentive, on- the-job owners, excellent young players, shorn of all their over-the-hill players to the likes of us, and play some decent attacking football. Perennial play-off hopefuls most seasons until November. Yes, it feels like a club neglected by dis-interested owners, but the 1st thing to address is hitting the back of the net - how Hudson or any other manager tackles that is anyone's guess...

Indeed. It's a pity the previous manager didn't address the problem when he had the chance. After all, he had more than enough time.