Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Neil Warnock

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Re: Neil Warnock

    Originally posted by Eric the Half a Bee View Post
    If we want to talk about percentages, the amount of chances created by free kicks, corners and throw ins is around 11% of all chances created. 23% of Championship goals come from set pieces, so it's hardly high percentage football unless you've got great delivery and lots of tall players, which we haven't got.

    Perhaps some of us are getting a bit confused by what you mean by long ball. Are you advocating just whacking it aimlessly upfield in the hope of winning a flick-on or getting the second ball? As percentages go, it's pretty low percentage football. With the players we have it would be almost 0% successful.

    There's a difference between long ball and direct. It's very possible to be a direct side who gets the ball forward early
    I thought the man who wants us playing liquid football would turn up with some kind of philosophical burger to sell

    Well I ain't buying it

    Stoke City 2008 to 2018

    Ten years they upset the big boys with anti football you lot would call it

    Ten years of them beating the likes of united and spurs

    And all some would do was to say it was boring football

    Jesus wept sort yourselves out

    Comment


    • Re: Neil Warnock

      Originally posted by Eric the Half a Bee View Post
      Yes it was. Look back at the highlights of the Villa game. We played some lovely stuff. We weren't long ball at Wolves, either.
      I don't need to look at highlights . I was at both games .

      Comment


      • Re: Neil Warnock

        Originally posted by Eric the Half a Bee View Post
        I reckon the vast majority of City fans would say the best football we played that season was at the start, when we were hardly a side that whacked it upfield with little aim. I've read so many times on here that the football we were playing at the end of the season was atritional at times and I agree.
        Surely not; you and everyone else are clearly deluded.

        Comment


        • Re: Neil Warnock

          Originally posted by logic View Post
          Surely not; you and everyone else are clearly deluded.
          Well you two are

          Comment


          • Re: Neil Warnock

            Originally posted by Bobby Dandruff View Post
            Meanwhile…..Carlos Corberan has lost two but won 8 since taking over at West Brom.

            Wasn’t he available when the club fired Morison?
            Really wanted us to go for him. Was never likely though. Doubt they've even heard of him.

            Comment


            • Re: Neil Warnock

              Originally posted by goats View Post
              Until May I’m sure they would
              Of course they would.

              Comment


              • Re: Neil Warnock

                Originally posted by Eric the Half a Bee View Post
                If we want to talk about percentages, the amount of chances created by free kicks, corners and throw ins is around 11% of all chances created. 23% of Championship goals come from set pieces, so it's hardly high percentage football unless you've got great delivery and lots of tall players, which we haven't got.

                Perhaps some of us are getting a bit confused by what you mean by long ball. Are you advocating just whacking it aimlessly upfield in the hope of winning a flick-on or getting the second ball? As percentages go, it's pretty low percentage football. With the players we have it would be almost 0% successful.

                There's a difference between long ball and direct. It's very possible to be a direct side who gets the ball forward early
                Most people want fast-attacking football with the ball arriving in the box quickly and players having some shots in a game, not 90 minutes with one shot on target all game and hardly any other shots.

                One of the best parts of the game from a fan's point of view is celebrating goals.

                Comment


                • Re: Neil Warnock

                  Originally posted by SLUDGE FACTORY View Post
                  I don't need to look at highlights . I was at both games .
                  And we played the same long ball, aimless football, that we used at the end of the season? You're prepared to commit yourself to this answer? I suggest you've been smoking too much wacky stuff.

                  Comment


                  • Re: Neil Warnock

                    Originally posted by North Cardiff Blue View Post
                    Most people want fast-attacking football with the ball arriving in the box quickly and players having some shots in a game, not 90 minutes with one shot on target all game and hardly any other shots.

                    One of the best parts of the game from a fan's point of view is celebrating goals.
                    I couldn't agree more, but the reason we're hardly getting any shots on target or goals is because we're desperately short of talent in attacking areas, not what football we play.

                    Comment


                    • Re: Neil Warnock

                      Originally posted by SLUDGE FACTORY View Post
                      I thought the man who wants us playing liquid football would turn up with some kind of philosophical burger to sell

                      Well I ain't buying it

                      Stoke City 2008 to 2018

                      Ten years they upset the big boys with anti football you lot would call it

                      Ten years of them beating the likes of united and spurs

                      And all some would do was to say it was boring football

                      Jesus wept sort yourselves out
                      I've never suggested I want us playing whatever the feck liquid football is.

                      I just think hoofing the ball aimlessly up field is a total waste of time and is utterly boring. I asked you a question about the difference between direct football and long ball football. Perhaps you'll answer it.

                      Comment


                      • Re: Neil Warnock

                        Originally posted by Eric the Half a Bee View Post
                        And we played the same long ball, aimless football, that we used at the end of the season? You're prepared to commit yourself to this answer? I suggest you've been smoking too much wacky stuff.
                        Under warnock we were a long ball direct route one team whatever you want to call it

                        You of course like it when you can pretend it's something it wasn't

                        Comment


                        • Re: Neil Warnock

                          Originally posted by Eric the Half a Bee View Post
                          I've never suggested I want us playing whatever the feck liquid football is.

                          I just think hoofing the ball aimlessly up field is a total waste of time and is utterly boring. I asked you a question about the difference between direct football and long ball football. Perhaps you'll answer it.
                          Just done it . You can call what you think is worth watching total football , pass and move , the Swansea way blah blah blah

                          You don't like old school football well the pretty football you like is taking us down

                          You lot won't have it and again tonight you pick at bits of warlocks time here to suit your own agenda

                          Well you lot were not complaining when we were going up 👆

                          Comment


                          • Re: Neil Warnock

                            Originally posted by SLUDGE FACTORY View Post
                            Just done it . You can call what you think is worth watching total football , pass and move , the Swansea way blah blah blah

                            You don't like old school football well the pretty football you like is taking us down

                            You lot won't have it and again tonight you pick at bits of warlocks time here to suit your own agenda

                            Well you lot were not complaining when we were going up ��
                            Are you stoned?

                            Comment


                            • Re: Neil Warnock

                              Originally posted by Eric the Half a Bee View Post
                              Are you stoned?
                              Stoke City 2008 to 2016 premier league

                              I bet if we got there with a robust approach , beating united and the like you would stay at home , depressed

                              Comment


                              • Re: Neil Warnock

                                Originally posted by SLUDGE FACTORY View Post
                                I thought the man who wants us playing liquid football would turn up with some kind of philosophical burger to sell

                                Well I ain't buying it

                                Stoke City 2008 to 2018

                                Ten years they upset the big boys with anti football you lot would call it

                                Ten years of them beating the likes of united and spurs

                                And all some would do was to say it was boring football

                                Jesus wept sort yourselves out
                                Those days have gone. nobody has been successful playing hoof ball in years

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X