Warnock not being considered

[blue lewj]

Re: Warnock not being considered

Like Eoin Doyle and Ronnie Moore ? Cracking idea.

I see what you've done there. Picked the players who scored before and they dried up when they came here.

Let's put it this way. I'd have more faith in somebody scoring goals if they had been scoring before than if they hadn't.

[Hilts]

Re: Warnock not being considered

Not sure why.

His record was almost as bad as Murphy's.

I think we paid the money on one prolific season at Bristol City.

[WJ99mobile]

Re: Warnock not being considered

Not sure why.

His record was almost as bad as Murphy's.

I don’t think it’s fair to compare previous signings to todays prices.

At the time you have Jordan Rhodes being handed round clubs for £17m and Assombalonga for £14m

If they had a few good seasons in the championship they would have gone for more than they came to us for

[blue lewj]

Re: Warnock not being considered

I don’t think it’s fair to compare previous signings to todays prices.

At the time you have Jordan Rhodes being handed round clubs for £17m and Assombalonga for £14m

If they had a few good seasons in the championship they would have gone for more than they came to us for

The two mentioned there are a world away from Murphy and Reid where goalscoring is concerned.

I didn't moan about the price of the players either. Tan did.
Moaning for apparently not scoring goals when they had hardly done so consistently before which is just odd.

Almost as odd as the David Marshall not scoring enough goals comment. We should have had alarm bells ringing at that stage.

[stan butler]

Re: Warnock not being considered

.
Waiting for Sammy the snake to turn up

Hammam wont be coming

[DubaiDai]

Re: Warnock not being considered

Exactly what I am thinking. Perhaps Warnock just cannot be arsed with City anymore, particularly at his age.
I just hope and pray City don’t take 3-4 weeks to bring someone in.
We may be nailed on relegation favourites by then