Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Harris in or Harris out?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Re: Harris in or Harris out?

    Originally posted by WJ99mobile View Post
    I think we overachieved last year with the players we have, which makes this season look even worse.

    I don’t think our players are actually that good.

    Is Harris getting the best out of them? No

    Is Harris shown that he’s tactically astute? Not in my opinion

    Do I think he’s awful like some others? No

    I think the players do need to look at themselves
    I agree. However, as I just posted elsewhere, the players need to look at themselves, but Harris has to know why things aren't working. If he doesn't, things will get worse and he shouldn't be in the job.

    Comment


    • #62
      Re: Harris in or Harris out?

      Originally posted by Pedro de la Rosa View Post
      Tonight was so bad, if there's not a reaction on Saturday he should go. He deserves at least until Saturday though. The players really, really let him down tonight. Regardless of what you think about his tactics, and I've criticised them, some of the players really half arsed it tonight. If they do it again on Saturday, they've quit on him.
      The first-half performance at QPR was bad and we got a reaction in the second half and against Barnsley, but a few games later and we're back in the same position. I struggle to see Harris turning this around. It's not like he can make 4 or 5 changes to the starting XI because the alternatives are even worse.

      Comment


      • #63
        Re: Harris in or Harris out?

        Originally posted by splott parker View Post
        It was one of Warnock’s good points being ‘in the know’, players such as Bamba, Hoilett, NML, Etheridge coming to us because of him really not because we’re Cardiff City. Of course he went on to waste money and burden us with dross but his initial bargain basement wheeling and dealing initially steadied a sinking ship.
        I’m sorry fella but the money wasted since and we continue to waste on the sort of contracts dished out far, far outweighs those 4 decent free transfers. Bamba being a classic case in point. Why give the guy a 2 year deal when he was out injured for a year? and was never going to be the same after such an injury at his age?

        Also, when people wax lyrical about the Hoilett and Bamba signings I don’t hear anyone mention Chamakh or Richardson.

        Comment


        • #64
          Re: Harris in or Harris out?

          Originally posted by J R Hartley View Post
          I’m sorry fella but the money wasted since and we continue to waste on the sort of contracts dished out far, far outweighs those 4 decent free transfers. Bamba being a classic case in point. Why give the guy a 2 year deal when he was out injured for a year? and was never going to be the same after such an injury at his age.

          Also, when people wax lyrical about the Hoilett and Bamba signings I don’t hear anyone mention Chamakh or Richardson.
          Gavin Whyte is now behind Mark Harris in the pecking order. Money well spent there

          Comment


          • #65
            Re: Harris in or Harris out?

            Originally posted by J R Hartley View Post
            I’m sorry fella but the money wasted since and we continue to waste on the sort of contracts dished out far, far outweighs those 4 decent free transfers. Bamba being a classic case in point. Why give the guy a 2 year deal when he was out injured for a year? and was never going to be the same after such an injury at his age.

            Also, when people wax lyrical about the Hoilett and Bamba signings I don’t hear anyone mention Chamakh or Richardson.
            In fairness, they were also free transfers, very low risk signings on short term contracts. Both might have been ok. They weren't. No damage done.

            Comment


            • #66
              Re: Harris in or Harris out?

              Originally posted by OurManFlint II View Post
              But we do spend proper money....
              Do we?

              Comment


              • #67
                Re: Harris in or Harris out?

                Originally posted by Eric the Half a Bee View Post
                In fairness, they were also free transfers, very low risk signings on short term contracts. Both might have been ok. They weren't. No damage done.
                What about the signings after them? Flint, Reid, Whyte, Murphy, Madine, Vaulks, Pack etc.

                Comment


                • #68
                  Re: Harris in or Harris out?

                  Originally posted by Pedro de la Rosa View Post
                  Gavin Whyte is now behind Mark Harris in the pecking order. Money well spent there
                  It’s ok I’m sure Eric will be along to defend the signing of Whyte. Only cost 2m. No harm done.

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Re: Harris in or Harris out?

                    Originally posted by WJ99mobile View Post
                    I think we overachieved last year with the players we have, which makes this season look even worse.

                    I don’t think our players are actually that good.

                    Is Harris getting the best out of them? No

                    Is Harris shown that he’s tactically astute? Not in my opinion

                    Do I think he’s awful like some others? No

                    I think the players do need to look at themselves
                    We were relegated from the premier league, people talk as if we came up from nowhere with Norman Tebbit on a bicycle with a piece of stale bread in our pocket.

                    I think that the way we handled ourselves in the premier league the season prior, it was not unreasonable to expect a team to be sat in the top 6 the following season (Throughout!). Especially given our long standing in this division and spending.

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Re: Harris in or Harris out?

                      Originally posted by Pedro de la Rosa View Post
                      Gavin Whyte is now behind Mark Harris in the pecking order. Money well spent there
                      We paid transfer fees for 6 players in that window and Marlon Pack has probably been the most successful of the lot.

                      What the **** was Warnock thinking?

                      Comment


                      • #71
                        Re: Harris in or Harris out?

                        Originally posted by OurManFlint II View Post
                        We were relegated from the premier league, people talk as if we came up from nowhere with Norman Tebbit on a bicycle with a piece of stale bread in our pocket.

                        I think that the way we handled ourselves in the premier league the season prior, it was not unreasonable to expect a team to be sat in the top 6 the following season (Throughout!). Especially given our long standing in this division and spending.
                        Did you see the signings we made in the summer of 2019?

                        Comment


                        • #72
                          Re: Harris in or Harris out?

                          Originally posted by J R Hartley View Post
                          Do we?
                          Prove to me that we don't?

                          I say that in the scale of things, of the 24 teams that play each season in this league for the combined majority of those we we are relatively big spenders. 2 promotions i feel is testament to that. I'm putting my neck on the line with what i perceive to be a fact, not an opinion.

                          Comment


                          • #73
                            Re: Harris in or Harris out?

                            Originally posted by J R Hartley View Post
                            It’s ok I’m sure Eric will be along to defend the signing of Whyte. Only cost 2m. No harm done.
                            Free signings on short term contracts, some work out, some don't.

                            Whyte never looked up to much for us. Never £2m. Poor.

                            Warnock's signings prior to the start of last season were dreadful and have helped put us in this position. However, that's not the reason for inept performances like we've seen this season.

                            Comment


                            • #74
                              Re: Harris in or Harris out?

                              Originally posted by Pedro de la Rosa View Post
                              What about the signings after them? Flint, Reid, Whyte, Murphy, Madine, Vaulks, Pack etc.
                              Different story. I was merely replying to the signings of Richardson and Chamakh.

                              Comment


                              • #75
                                Re: Harris in or Harris out?

                                Originally posted by OurManFlint II View Post
                                Prove to me that we don't?

                                I say that in the scale of things, of the 24 teams that play each season in this league for the combined majority of those we we are relatively big spenders. 2 promotions i feel is testament to that. I'm putting my neck on the line with what i perceive to be a fact, not an opinion.
                                Youve still got to spend it wisely. We completely wasted a lot of money last season but even then it was nothing compared to what others in the division spent.

                                Brentford just signed a striker for 10m. We signed one for 2m.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X