Quote Originally Posted by cyril evans awaydays View Post
And there was me wondering why you thought the Senedd was a dominant entity when these are undertakings that achieve a dominant market position.

Undertakings are defined as " any natural or legal person engaged in economic activity, regardless of its legal
status and the way in which it is financed. It includes companies, partnerships, firms, businesses, individuals operating as sole traders, agricultural cooperatives, associations of undertakings (e.g. trade associations), non-profit making organisations and (in some circumstances) public entities that offer goods or services on a given market.

With your extensive knowledge of commercial law perhaps you could explain how the Senedd meets the definition of an undertaking that has become a dominant entity?
It’s to do with their influence on the market, not necessarily the market share an entity holds.Whilst each case can be different depending on market size etc it’s not unusual to be deemed dominant with a 5% share,
When you look at what the Senedd did unlawfully for commercial reasons was to trim the range of goods available to the general public throughout all supermarkets in Wales, at a time when the opportunities for the welsh public to travel to outlets that had a full range of goods on sale were non existent.