Quote Originally Posted by lisvaneblue View Post
In my book he’s distorting competition. The Senedd is a dominant entity managing 5% of uk population. Assuming that supermarkets are spread evenly across the uk population, at a stroke he’s reduced the availability of a significant range of goods across 5% of the UKs supermarkets. He’s not done it for public health reasons, he’s done it to be seen to be fair, or level things up for non essential closed shops in Wales and to protect them from competition while closed. Ie Commercial reasons. I don’t think this is in the Senedd remit, and if you are interested have a look at the particular responsibilities dominant entities have in Competition law. This is why I think the whole thing will be softened once he has met with the supermarkets
I don't see it at all. You mentioned competition law and then, when asked what specific law, you mentioned Article 82/83 of EU competition law.

I looked at them and couldn't find anything relevant other than something that Drakeford had actively done to meet one of those laws.

You've had a few opportunities to point out which one(s) in particular he's broken but haven't been forthcoming with a response.

I think it's fair to say that you have an opinion about this and you're going to stick with it... even though it doesn't make a lot of sense to me.

We'll have to agree to disagree on this, I think.