+ Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 32

Thread: Labour MP vs Monarchist lackeys and forelock tuggers (0 - 1)

  1. #1
    International jon1959's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Sheffield - out of Roath
    Posts
    18,173

    Labour MP vs Monarchist lackeys and forelock tuggers (0 - 1)

    https://www.theguardian.com/politics...-it-as-protest

    A Labour MP has had to return to parliament to be sworn in again a week after he protested against pledging allegiance to the king as he took the oath.

    Clive Lewis, a prominent supporter of Britain becoming a republic, returned after parliamentary authorities told him he might not be able to speak in the Commons, vote or receive a salary, and could even face a byelection if legal action was taken against him under the Parliamentary Oaths Act.

    The Norwich South MP did not refer to “his heirs and successors” after a mention of the king when he said during a swearing in last week: “I take this oath under protest and in the hope that one day my fellow citizens will democratically decide to live in a republic.

    “Until that time I do solemnly, sincerely and truly declare and affirm that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to His Majesty King Charles, according to law.”

    Lewis said on X on Tuesday: “After omitting to swear allegiance to King Charles’ ‘heirs and successors’ last week, I’ve had to take the oath again in order to sit in the House of Commons.

    “The majority of the public are committed to democracy, and so I hope one day MPs can swear an oath based on those values.”



    We need more Clive Lewis's. A lot more!

  2. #2

    Re: Labour MP vs Monarchist lackeys and forelock tuggers (0 - 1)

    Quote Originally Posted by jon1959 View Post
    https://www.theguardian.com/politics...-it-as-protest

    A Labour MP has had to return to parliament to be sworn in again a week after he protested against pledging allegiance to the king as he took the oath.

    Clive Lewis, a prominent supporter of Britain becoming a republic, returned after parliamentary authorities told him he might not be able to speak in the Commons, vote or receive a salary, and could even face a byelection if legal action was taken against him under the Parliamentary Oaths Act.

    The Norwich South MP did not refer to “his heirs and successors” after a mention of the king when he said during a swearing in last week: “I take this oath under protest and in the hope that one day my fellow citizens will democratically decide to live in a republic.

    “Until that time I do solemnly, sincerely and truly declare and affirm that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to His Majesty King Charles, according to law.”

    Lewis said on X on Tuesday: “After omitting to swear allegiance to King Charles’ ‘heirs and successors’ last week, I’ve had to take the oath again in order to sit in the House of Commons.

    “The majority of the public are committed to democracy, and so I hope one day MPs can swear an oath based on those values.”



    We need more Clive Lewis's. A lot more!
    Clive is an absolute hero! What a brilliant plea for democracy! A special man.

  3. #3

    Re: Labour MP vs Monarchist lackeys and forelock tuggers (0 - 1)

    That will be on the front page of the sun

    And he's mixed race so they won't like that !

    Sod em

  4. #4

    Re: Labour MP vs Monarchist lackeys and forelock tuggers (0 - 1)

    Quote Originally Posted by Dorcus View Post
    Clive is an absolute hero! What a brilliant plea for democracy! A special man.
    Ah yes, Clive 'get on your knees bitch' Lewis. A very special man indeed..

  5. #5
    pipster
    Guest

    Re: Labour MP vs Monarchist lackeys and forelock tuggers (0 - 1)

    Is this the same Clive Lewis who along with naz shah embroiled themselves in the Corbinista anti semite brigade

  6. #6
    International jon1959's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Sheffield - out of Roath
    Posts
    18,173

    Re: Labour MP vs Monarchist lackeys and forelock tuggers (0 - 1)

    Quote Originally Posted by pipster View Post
    Is this the same Clive Lewis who along with naz shah embroiled themselves in the Corbinista anti semite brigade
    Complete confusion or gross distortion? Let’s call it a score draw!

  7. #7

    Re: Labour MP vs Monarchist lackeys and forelock tuggers (0 - 1)

    I generally disagree with his politics, but you get nice people across the spectrum and he certainly doesn't come across as one of them. That said, I've never met him but I gather he is not universally admired as one of politics nice guys

  8. #8

    Re: Labour MP vs Monarchist lackeys and forelock tuggers (0 - 1)

    Quote Originally Posted by jon1959 View Post
    Complete confusion or gross distortion? Let’s call it a score draw!
    I think complete rubbish from an angry right winger out of power more appropriate

  9. #9
    pipster
    Guest

    Re: Labour MP vs Monarchist lackeys and forelock tuggers (0 - 1)

    He was ousted by his own side, that should tell you all you need to know. He has his head up his own backside on most things
    He knew he had to swear an oath to the Monarch (it’s a requirement of the job and has been for hundreds of years) so as per the attention seeking bell end does something to get him the attention he craves
    Bellend just like bellends that worship him, including closet tories from the vale

  10. #10

    Re: Labour MP vs Monarchist lackeys and forelock tuggers (0 - 1)

    Quote Originally Posted by JamesWales View Post
    I generally disagree with his politics, but you get nice people across the spectrum and he certainly doesn't come across as one of them. That said, I've never met him but I gather he is not universally admired as one of politics nice guys
    The voice of reason who doesn't like hearsay.🤣

  11. #11
    International jon1959's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Sheffield - out of Roath
    Posts
    18,173

    Re: Labour MP vs Monarchist lackeys and forelock tuggers (0 - 1)


  12. #12

    Re: Labour MP vs Monarchist lackeys and forelock tuggers (0 - 1)

    Quote Originally Posted by pipster View Post
    He was ousted by his own side, that should tell you all you need to know. He has his head up his own backside on most things
    He knew he had to swear an oath to the Monarch (it’s a requirement of the job and has been for hundreds of years) so as per the attention seeking bell end does something to get him the attention he craves
    Bellend just like bellends that worship him, including closet tories from the vale
    Christ you are a fecking sly little prick fair play

  13. #13

    Re: Labour MP vs Monarchist lackeys and forelock tuggers (0 - 1)

    Quote Originally Posted by SLUDGE FACTORY View Post
    Christ you are a fecking sly little prick fair play
    In April 2015, during an interview by the New Statesman, in response to a question on whether he was taking his upcoming victory for granted, he said he would only lose if "he was caught with [his] pants down behind a goat with Ed Miliband at the other end"

    Yes, we need more like him..

  14. #14

    Re: Labour MP vs Monarchist lackeys and forelock tuggers (0 - 1)

    Quote Originally Posted by Hilts View Post
    The voice of reason who doesn't like hearsay.🤣
    Pretty certain I have read opinions from you that are far worse about people that I am certain you wouldn't have met in person yourself

  15. #15
    International jon1959's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Sheffield - out of Roath
    Posts
    18,173

    Re: Labour MP vs Monarchist lackeys and forelock tuggers (0 - 1)

    Quote Originally Posted by A Quiet Monkfish View Post
    In April 2015, during an interview by the New Statesman, in response to a question on whether he was taking his upcoming victory for granted, he said he would only lose if "he was caught with [his] pants down behind a goat with Ed Miliband at the other end"

    Yes, we need more like him..
    Glad someone read the link. I doubt pipster will.

    Clive Lewis said 9 years ago that he is 'sincerely sorry if (you) have been offended by the comment'. Take the apology!

  16. #16

    Re: Labour MP vs Monarchist lackeys and forelock tuggers (0 - 1)

    Quote Originally Posted by A Quiet Monkfish View Post
    In April 2015, during an interview by the New Statesman, in response to a question on whether he was taking his upcoming victory for granted, he said he would only lose if "he was caught with [his] pants down behind a goat with Ed Miliband at the other end"

    Yes, we need more like him..
    I am referring to pipsters very devious ways regarding thinking he knows where someone lives and what they do and his complete lack of willingness to be subject to the same rules

  17. #17
    pipster
    Guest

    Re: Labour MP vs Monarchist lackeys and forelock tuggers (0 - 1)

    I read the link Jon, I read all of it. The fact he had the bollox to serve is to be applauded, very much so.
    However, Lewis like mercer has found politics to be a different kind of enemy.
    He should be used to following rules and orders, like he did when he signed up, and would have declared an oath to defend the queen or did he refuse that as well ?

  18. #18
    International Citizen's Nephew's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2020
    Location
    Cardiff
    Posts
    5,824

    Re: Labour MP vs Monarchist lackeys and forelock tuggers (0 - 1)

    Quote Originally Posted by jon1959 View Post
    Glad someone read the link. I doubt pipster will.

    Clive Lewis said 9 years ago that he is 'sincerely sorry if (you) have been offended by the comment'. Take the apology!
    I think there's a lot of 'selective memory' syndrome going since the GE. That, a sense-of-humour failure.

    ...it's funny how people see activism as self-obsession when in fact it's highlighting the completely awful practice of having an unelected person who was birthed out of a very specific and anointed (by a god) vagina who gets to play cosplay and strut around with a massive sense of entitlement. Yet Clive is the bad 'un! As for all of the rest of them wearing ridiculous clobber...could they look more stupid?

  19. #19
    International Citizen's Nephew's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2020
    Location
    Cardiff
    Posts
    5,824

    Re: Labour MP vs Monarchist lackeys and forelock tuggers (0 - 1)

    Quote Originally Posted by pipster View Post
    I read the link Jon, I read all of it. The fact he had the bollox to serve is to be applauded, very much so.
    However, Lewis like mercer has found politics to be a different kind of enemy.
    He should be used to following rules and orders, like he did when he signed up, and would have declared an oath to defend the queen or did he refuse that as well ?
    Most of your posts seem to fall into this definition: 'Changing the narrative is synonymous with changing the story which means either something has happened that changes things or you are making something happen that change things or you are choosing to focus on something else that happened which changes the story/narrative'.

  20. #20
    pipster
    Guest

    Re: Labour MP vs Monarchist lackeys and forelock tuggers (0 - 1)

    Lewis swore on oath of allegiance to the monarch when he signed up for military service. Yet when he is required to do the same thing as an MP he rufuses
    Attention seeking pillock, just like Gerry Adams when refused to do the same thing

  21. #21

    Re: Labour MP vs Monarchist lackeys and forelock tuggers (0 - 1)

    Clive for PM Id say! He's a Godsend in the murky world of politics.

  22. #22

    Re: Labour MP vs Monarchist lackeys and forelock tuggers (0 - 1)

    Quote Originally Posted by A Quiet Monkfish View Post
    In April 2015, during an interview by the New Statesman, in response to a question on whether he was taking his upcoming victory for granted, he said he would only lose if "he was caught with [his] pants down behind a goat with Ed Miliband at the other end"

    Yes, we need more like him..
    He was only kidding around

  23. #23

    Re: Labour MP vs Monarchist lackeys and forelock tuggers (0 - 1)

    Quote Originally Posted by pipster View Post
    Lewis swore on oath of allegiance to the monarch when he signed up for military service. Yet when he is required to do the same thing as an MP he rufuses
    Attention seeking pillock, just like Gerry Adams when refused to do the same thing
    I have no skin in this game but it's quite possible that someone takes a different view of the oath situation when they are two or three decades older. I think I swore allegiance to 'God and the Queen' when I was in the Air Training Corps but I certainly wouldn't do it now.

  24. #24

    Re: Labour MP vs Monarchist lackeys and forelock tuggers (0 - 1)

    Quote Originally Posted by pipster View Post
    Lewis swore on oath of allegiance to the monarch when he signed up for military service. Yet when he is required to do the same thing as an MP he rufuses
    Attention seeking pillock, just like Gerry Adams when refused to do the same thing
    I doubt anyone writing a pamphlet on Gerry Adams's virtues would make it to a second page but concluding that him never swearing an oath of allegiance to the British Crown because he was an "attention seeking pillock" demonstrates a breathtaking ignorance of Irish political history.

  25. #25
    International jon1959's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Sheffield - out of Roath
    Posts
    18,173

    Re: Labour MP vs Monarchist lackeys and forelock tuggers (0 - 1)

    Quote Originally Posted by Dorcus View Post
    He was only kidding around
    This deserves more love!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •