You could always try to respond to the observation that court proceedings ended way before Lineker's tweet so your "valued" opinion that "the reason his Tweeted about immigration ( which I agree with) was to prove to the HMRC that he was freelance. The tweet was all manufactured then IMHO and saved him 4.9m". I suppose?
I don't quite understand why Tito was banned. He seemed to have a bit of spunk but never went beyond the bounds of whatever the rules are today.
That said, the strange thing is with posters like Ronnie, pipster and yourself, they quickly reach an intellectual plateau and can never quite seem to break free from it. Why do you think that is ?