Quote Originally Posted by pipster View Post
I havent read the court transcript yet (but as predicted) i suspect his 'show down' with the beeb over his right to do what he did, will have been mentioned in the case. Put it this - his lawyers would be mad not to include such high profile and public evidence.

This may set precedence now as what can be defined as being employed by your own personal services company and what constitutes disguised employment.
Are they allowed to introduce new evidence in an appeal of this nature?

Particularly as it is about a previous financial year.