+ Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results |
With no Scotland, and following the recent parliamentary boundary changes, tory government after government would be a lot more likely. And given the makeup of the brexit bunch its fairly safe to assume tgat any lurch to the right would put the bbc and the NHS firmly on target.
As it stands we have a health secretary with links to private medicine who has written a book calling for the NHS to be replaced with an insurance system, and a culture secretary who has described the licence fee as being worse than the poll tax, and the decimation of the bbc as a tantalising prospect and is openly a huge fan of Rupert Murdoch .
To give them the free pass that brexit inevitably would is kissing goodbye to both institutions
But isn't that the same for both sides Eric?,
I'd be interested to read that the NHS, pensions, EURO Army, Jobs, House prices are ring fenced from any Brussels interference, back it up with evidence and I'll shut the f**k up I promise, scaremongering from both sides because the detail from both sides is basically non existent, wouldn't you agree ?.
EU-Funds.jpg
What has the Labour led senedd been doing with this dough?, 1033 euro per head more than a cockney
I find it amusing that rising house prices is considered a bad thing whilst a drop in house prices is also considered undesirable. In reality, your view may very well depend on whether you are 'a have or a have not'.
Not following your logic at all here, sorry. What I am saying is that we have a large number of elected people sitting in Parliament for the next 5 years having only just been put there by the democratic process known as the General Election.
They're the ones who should be making these decisions, not us lot of ill-advised, mis-informed degenerates who think that voting one way solves the one major issue that pisses us off.
Even if I vote leave, every so often the 650 MPs will decide to put another vote-losing option to a referendum just so that they can dodge the electoral mess of putting their own balls on the chopping block.
What I want to know is if leaving the EU is such an obviously disastrous idea, then why are they putting it to a public vote?
Personally I think we'll stay but we'll do well not to underestimate the huge amount of old people who could well decide things seeing as:
1. They're more likely to vote than youngsters.
2. They're crazy old bigots.
If there is enough demand for it the uk government would not be able to deny it.
Imagine the SNP called for a referendum and prime minister Boris said no- but they decided to have one anyway which was voted out by a landslide, what could the Tories do? Send in the troops?
Brussels leak reveals NHS will be ‘KILLED OFF’ if the United Kingdom remains in the EU
http://europeanpressagency.com/featu...ains-in-the-eu
No surprise: EU army plans KEPT SECRET from British voters until after Brexit referendum (Video)
http://europeanpressagency.com/polit...ferendum-video
This domain was registered in February this year, almost as if for the sole purpose of pumping out anti-eu propaganda before the referendum.
If TTIP eventually becomes ratified (note 'if' and 'eventually') then it will be because Europe has elected leaders and MEP's who have voted in favour of it. We aren't being frogmarched towards the deal by Europe, we are one of the only countries where the major parties are broadly in favour of it.
Regarding an EU army. The EU doesn't need an army, why would it want an army. I can't work out why this is even a talking point. Drummed up by Moscow and some desperate 'leavers' imo.