+ Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results |
Rather misleading to call it the "European Press Agency" don't you think?
Cameron is certainly promoting his own belief that we remain in the EU. Whilst it has been rather over-egged I don't think anyone can seriously dismiss the numerous economic projections about the cost of Brexit as "project fear." That's just laziness and a clear sign that the economic argument is lost.
I agree that it's about one's personal experiences of the UK and where we see it in the future.
that is the point i was making we elect them MP's at the General election, they decide ( and vote ) on Law's and Policies
Now if we stay in and the EU gets more and more power ( to decide on our law's and policies ) we havent elected them, will they do what is better for the UK ? ? ?
I like the commitment in their phraseology. "It appears to confirm".
"It includes a US Proposal" - so, just a proposal, and nothing there to say that the NHS is one of those so-called "Monopolies". I mean, the UK Government has a monopoly on policing, fire fighting, and the military too. Strange how none of these monopolies are under threat.
"But it would still be able to review state-run services in this country. Its duties would include checking that state services do not “distort” the market." - not sure what they base that on but, again, why is the NHS the only service being mentioned?
"One section of the papers makes it clear that the EU and America would seek eventually to end all forms of state intervention in competition with the private sector." - again what bearing does this have on the NHS?
One thing I'd like to mention here, if the US are insisting on a TTIP arrangement with the EU - surely they would insist on something similar when striking a new trade agreement with a UK that has left the EU?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/poli...l-beaming.html - Said Boris Johnson in October 2014.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk...-a7030981.html
On the EU Army, Britain has the right to veto such plans. In fact, as your article mentions, they did exactly that 5 years ago.
Scotland's first minister has already said that if Scotland votes to stay, but is taken out of the EU by England against the will of the Scottish people then they will have another independence referendum.
As they are the ruling party in Scotland , what could the Tories do to stop them if they do?
Westminster does have to approve any referendum. The SNP cannot just go ahead and have one. However even the right wing Tories would struggle to turn down another referendum given that the Scots people's desires to stay in the EU had been dashed by the English.
This thread is full of people who have whinged about scaremongering and then done it themselves, my accusation to nelson was made precisely because he has been crying ' scaremongering' for weeks at anything remotely anti-leave. You have bypassed all of them to have a go at me. You seem to have some sort of problem with me. Not sure why.
Who takes any notice of what he says?, ever
http://yournewswire.com/japanese-lea...-to-hit-world/
But the FACT remains Tommy is that, Wales has been getting 1000 euro extra per head more than many other parts of the UK but the usual suspects still want to blame Westminster when they should be looking at the performance of Welsh Labour cemented in the senedd for the past 18 years.
I've probably read more books than you've had hot baths, but that aside, high property prices are the most divisive factor between the generations at the moment. We old people benefitted from moderate house prices and were able to estimate approx 4 times salary as being affordable for our first property purchase. You'd be looking at 10 times salary at least these days. Although I'm a property owner, I would welcome a downward adjustment in the whole property market. Why? I have 2 sons in their 20s. By the way if you're going to to reply, kindly remember your manners g'boy.