Quote Originally Posted by Wales-Bales View Post
They didn't reveal the identity of the true owners of the plane, and I know for a fact that a government agency has that information, but it was excluded from yesterday's report. Hence it is my personal opinion that some kind of parallel investigation is taking place. If you don't agree, then you need to convince yourself why there wouldn't be an investigation, given all of the accusations of dodgy behaviour reported in the press. I like to keep an open mind and I don't wait around waiting to be told what to think. There are a lot issues surrounding this case that don't make any sense at all. Put it this way, if there wasn't some kind of ongoing investigation taking place I would be very surprised.
The identity of the aircraft’s owner has no bearing on the crash, it’s not relevant. For example, if I loaned my car to you and someone smashed into you on the M4, the fact that I own the car is irrelevant to the cause of the crash.

The report states the maintenance history of the aircraft, which is relevant and appears to be within the legal requirements.

You need to understand that in a report of this nature, there is no room for emotion, sentiment or speculation, just facts that are provable with evidence.

No crime has been reported (that I’m aware of anyway), so what is it you think the police are investigating ? Just because we don’t know who owns the aircraft doesn’t mean anything illegal has taken place. Shell companies, for example, exist to mask things like this. Whilst they appear shady they are legal.

If the AAIB discovers evidence of a crime I’m sure it will be passed on to the police and/or other relevant authorities. Until then, there is no crime so nothing to investigate.