Quote Originally Posted by Loramski View Post
You've just proved my point though, that was your first reply to Heisenberg when he pointed out they were historical offences. As I've pointed out twice already (are there three of you?), that doesn't make any sense anyway, if it did then 'why does Michael Jackson still feel the need to (allegedly) abuse children?' would make sense. That's how ridiculous your argument is.

I know Mike hasn't got a duty of care to his posters but maybe he could do something to help you, you're obviously in a bad place.
Michael Jackson is dead, yet you talk about him in the present tense. Your task is simple, prove statement a) above is not true because that example uses exactly the same logic. You keep talking about needing help, I think you are the one that needs it! You are more interested in derailing threads than talking about the topic!!