Originally Posted by
CCFCC3PO
Beats me. I think it's because I posted a theory that this could go on for years.
@The Lone Gunman sarcastically labels me "an expert", somehow uses the date of the first day I posted on the subject (7/3) as something that is odd (we had just 209 cases on that day), and whilst calling me a "self-professed (sic)" expert also tried to make mileage from my use of statements like "could be", yet I am posting things as factual.
It is clear this guy is a troll of some sort. He rarely posts on subjects, goes into personal attacks, and tries to deflect the argument to befit a style only his self grandeur could ever carry off wearing. In effect, he'd be walking around stark bollock naked.
It's clear that the point I was making was that people should not assume immunity until immunity has been proven. That, to me, seems logical and worth passing the advice on (especially on a forum where people advise others they can go to friend's houses for a drink, providing they stay 2m apart). To @The Lone Gunman - it appears as something else.
He's logged off for dinner now, so probably will have a cutting remark about how I was posting 45 minutes after he logged off as something of a point scored by him.
Can't believe he is 53 though, far too old for a mid life crisis surely.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote