Quote Originally Posted by xsnaggle View Post
I don't think they did, but the second story was spun as the guy admits it was a lie and you expect professional journalists to spot that, if it suited them, ahe Tit about the police speaking to Cummins' family was spun, the reality being that they went there when called by Mr cummins senior to discuss security, nothing to do with Cummins and his trip. Things like that just taint the truth that they are built on.
But when the shit storm started before I had only read one article and people started to attack me referring to a completely different article. But its over and I have no wish to reignite that.
And it happens I don't like him anyway, there are some people you can take an instant dislike to just looking at them, and for me he is one of those.
You would expect the Mail to spin that but it just re-enforces my point about that fact you cannot trust anything today to be the straight truth, it is all spun to suit one agenda or the other.
I feel like you keep glossing over the point I'm making - why do you keep saying that the Cummings story was "spun"?

Out of everything that was reported there was one inaccuracy - and that appears to be because the so-called witness went to some effort with his lie.

That's not spinning the story - that's printing exactly what happened and being given dodgy information by someone.

Where do you think the "spin" is in this story from the left-wing media?