[QUOTE=cyril evans awaydays;5124619]
Quote Originally Posted by lisvaneblue View Post

The key thing in your search is at what stage the details of the "tender" were published in the OJEU. In the case of the £122m contract awarded to PPP Medpro the first OJEU notification was after the contract was awarded.

It would appear that this was a direct award (ie no competitive tender) under negotiated procedure.

4) The Department for Health and Social Care (‘DHSC’) is satisfied the tests permitting use of the negotiated procedure without prior publication (Regulation 32(2)(c)) were met:

http://bidstats.uk/tenders/2020/W37/734724148

As you say there were hundreds of tenders for PPP in the OJEU from March. Many, from local councils and organisations such as the Scottish Government went through notification and tender procedures. This does not seem to be the case for the English Government Departments which were contracting first and putting notices of who they awarded it to in the OJEU later. Presumably to give some degree of cover in the event of legal challenge for their actions.

http://bidstats.uk/tenders/?q=ppe&ca...5-734724148-45

If you could point out the false news bits in the PPP Medpro story that would be really interesting.
Negotiated procedures are legit. I remember getting called by the MOD for supply of specific medicines in the Falklands War. There were others they could supply but not in the volumes and time frames required. So it was all done and dusted very quickly.

This seems to be the same. The contract was for 25 million gowns, Florence Roby, according to the Twitter account, could supply 40,000 a month...500,000 a year approx, nowhere near what was required. The award was made by DOHSC, and in my dealings with them, which were many, they are rigorous and above board. Ppe Medpro must have offered guarantees regarding supply and quality