Songs Of Praise

[Taunton Blue Genie]

Waiting for someone to explain the difference here

Just found this

"Although inoculation and vaccination are sometimes used interchangeably, one is ultimately an act and the other is the process that spurs immunity. By definition:

Inoculation is the act of introducing a vaccine into a person's body. It can be used in other contexts, such as when a culture is inoculated with body fluids (such as from a nasal swab) to test for the presence of a bacterium or virus.

Vaccination is the process of introducing a vaccine into the body to produce immunity to a specific disease. Vaccines are usually administered through needle injections but can also be administered by mouth or sprayed into a nostril"

[lisvaneblue]

K

Waiting for someone to explain the difference here

It stems from smallpox back in the 1700s. Inoculation was achieved by injecting a small amount of smallpox to get the body to react and develop immunity. I think back then people were scratched with rather the needles we know today. Jenner discovered that using weaker or attenuated cowpox into someone the body developed immunity for smallpox. The Latin word for cow is vacca.....so says it all really

Today vaccines use attenuated, or modified viruses, just as Jenner discovered, to get an immune response from the body

[Taunton Blue Genie]

K

It stems from smallpox back in the 1700s. Inoculation was achieved by injecting a small amount of smallpox to get the body to react and develop immunity. Jenner discovered that using weaker or attenuated cowpox into someone the body developed immunity for smallpox. The Latin word for cow is vacca.....so says it all really

Gotcha....or have I?

[lisvaneblue]

[QUOTE=Croesy Blue;5170040]It evolves but there is proof for every bit of it.[/QUOTE

Progress in biological science is frequently made without proof. Having evidence to suggest X or Y is the way it works. So there is not proof for every bit of it.

[lisvaneblue]

Gotcha....or have I?

Have another look at my post as I added a few sentences for clarification

[Wash DC Blue]

Waiting for someone to explain the difference here

Dr John Campbell explains the difference 30 seconds into this video when discussing human trials.

https://youtu.be/Qr6Tn5DU_Sw

[Taunton Blue Genie]

Dr John Campbell explains the difference 30 seconds into this video when discussing human trials.

https://youtu.be/Qr6Tn5DU_Sw

Excellent, thanks. Something to put on the 'What I have learned this week' thread

[Wash DC Blue]

Excellent, thanks. Something to put on the 'What I have learned this week' thread

No worries 👍

[Croesy Blue]

Dr John Campbell explains the difference 30 seconds into this video when discussing human trials.

https://youtu.be/Qr6Tn5DU_Sw

[lisvaneblue]

Dr John Campbell explains the difference 30 seconds into this video when discussing human trials.

https://youtu.be/Qr6Tn5DU_Sw

I think that's what I was saying, but he's using the latest human challenge study as a very good example.

[Croesy Blue]

[QUOTE=lisvaneblue;5170065]

It evolves but there is proof for every bit of it.[/QUOTE

Progress in biological science is frequently made without proof. Having evidence to suggest X or Y is the way it works. So there is not proof for every bit of it.

It’s made using evidence backed hypotheses, you cannot seriously compare this to the belief in a god.

[lisvaneblue]

[QUOTE=Croesy Blue;5170111]

It’s made using evidence backed hypotheses, you cannot seriously compare this to the belief in a god.

I wasn't I was just saying that your comments about proof at each stage is wrong

[Taunton Blue Genie]

Boris just used the word 'inoculated'.....

[Tuerto]

Boris just used the word 'inoculated'.....

And even Boris is correct once a day.

[lisvaneblue]

Boris just used the word 'inoculated'.....

I hope everything else he said is more accurate