Quote Originally Posted by chrisp_1927 View Post
We were 81/3 after 9.2 when him and Cooke came together. So a pretty strong position, although admittedly would have been better if Cooke hadn't just run out our best batsman. They then had 5 overs together and only scored 25 runs. It was a disaster
We were 81 for 1 just 2 balls earlier.
Had we lost another wicket or 2 in the next 5 overs that would have been a disaster.
Find it harsh you are having a go at the joint top scorer who scored at the fastest rate.
So if he had scored 15 runs in 8 balls and got out you would have been happier with that than his 41????