I find this recent campaign against dalman and Choo all a bit strange.
I don't know what they do from day to day, and nor do the rest of us.
yes they don't have a background in football, but that is the case in many clubs if you look into it.
lots of directors of football even aren't former players
they employ individuals with the expertise and have to trust their judgement. the same kind of situation exists in many industries.
Warnock, Harris, McCarthy aren't the type of appointments that I would have made, but they were all decent championship managers, it's not as though they were putting unknowns in there.
we are where we are now. we seem to have been proactive in stripping cost out, which is better than the alternative, and we are taking approaches to try to build for the future with youth players and younger signings being made.
that's about all we can ask for right now.
the premier League money is gone, we are adapting to a new world now and it'll take us fans time to accept the new reality.

I'm not sure what else you'd expect another board to do at this present time?
perhaps being in a more progressive manager? but there are no risk free managerial appointments.

it just feels like some people want to criticize Tan or by association, any of "his men" and are taking our current malaise to do it.
in reality the criticism should have been voiced over the last few years when we weren't trying to bring any youth through or sign players who could increase in value.
we appear to be on a more sensible track now, so let's see where it goes