Quote Originally Posted by SLUDGE FACTORY View Post
They were 17 ?

I am amazed he wasn't spoken to by the police about these matters

Maybe they cautioned him ?

If any of the learners were under 16 then he's surely got to be cautioned ?
17 is legal Sludge but that's not the point. The man is a wrong un, he was in a position of trust and abused that trust. If under 16 then charge him with inciting a minor with sexual activity.

NB at 17, you're still a child. any man (or woman) over the age of say 21 needs to rethink their life choices if they're targeting someone that young. Whilst not illegal, its definitely not right.