Quote Originally Posted by Croesy Blue View Post
It doesn’t mean he is completely innocent either though. You’re basing your whole opinion off that video without knowing what started everyone hitting him.

Seems you’ve made your mind up without wanting to see the full set of evidence. I seriously cannot believe you’re calling that guy a “dangerous criminal” based on that.

Wandering into a city win a gun looking for a fight then winding someone up into attacking you does not mean you should be able to shoot them without repercussion. That’s what sets the precedent. Get someone to attack and say you shot them in self defence because you feared for your safety. Dangerous, stupid and again something politicised that shouldn’t be.
I am not sure why you keep emphasising 'dangerous criminal' I have not used those words in my posts, maybe you are quoting someone else?

The thing is that like it or not, he is allowed to wander into a city with a gun and open carry, because the law allows him too.

and in turn the jury was correct to accept his argument fo self defence because it clearly was.

I agree it is a bad precedent but you can not send the kid to prison when he acted within the law. You have to instead change the law