I haven't heard Schwab say so, but this photo suggests Boris Johnson is another from his stable of young global leaders. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E7UgRIcXEAQ0vPJ.jpg

Schwab's on record stating that Macron in France, Trudeau in Canada and Putin in Russia are. They are among the main protagonists in what's filling the news every day.

Has Putin really gone rogue, or does he remain a Schwab team player who's playing the designated baddie role in an orchestrated bullshit production which has been created to advance the Great Reset agenda?

As we know, the two repeated taglines of the Great Reset is Build Back Better and You Will Own Nothing and Be Happy. Build Back Better is interpreted to mean replace the old to institute a new digital world which is outlined in the World Economic Forum's published documents that anyone can read online and was quoted extensively from by Russell Brand in a video posted earlier in this thread.

What we don't know is what their timeline is for this switch. Is it 20 or 50 years hence, or have they tired of going about it incrementally with baby steps as they have steadfastly done for decades by making the use of electronic (or digital) money more convenient and popular than exchanging notes and coins for goods and services.

It's a head scratcher to determine how they are so confident the second half of You Will Own Nothing and Be Happy is to be achieved.

The first half, You Will Own Nothing, has to mean some Orwellian dictatorship. There's provision for that already on the UK's Statute Book found inside The Civil Contingencies Act 2004 under Emergency Powers. Here: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2004/36/part/2

These are among what will be legal if and when a crisis comes along, whether real or contrived, that will be available to Johnson and the rest of them who gave us the Coronavirus Act 2020. Taken literally, the state would be able to forcibly remove any citizen to a place it deems necessary and confiscate their property (property can mean everything they possess) at no cost to the state.

(b) provide for or enable the requisition or confiscation of property (with or without compensation);
(c) provide for or enable the destruction of property, animal life or plant life (with or without compensation);
(d) prohibit, or enable the prohibition of, movement to or from a specified place;
(e) require, or enable the requirement of, movement to or from a specified place;
(f) prohibit, or enable the prohibition of, assemblies of specified kinds, at specified places or at specified times;
(g) prohibit, or enable the prohibition of, travel at specified times;
(h) prohibit, or enable the prohibition of, other specified activities.