Originally Posted by
life on mars
Of course Boris incident was worse as was rhe deception, but this will appear a strangly timed event after yesterday ..
That's not my view however there is a word called perception and lots use it against all Tories.which is unfair for those decent folk .
Anyway can someone please answer the question why deny Ang's presence which was initially said ..
My humble theory they didn't want to lose both and she wasn't.clearly shown in the picture..
It seems to me that both were workplaces, both had large gaterings and drink , both exceeded the rule of 6 , Labour's as was the Tories was an alleged late working event.
It depends on how you view the law , same potential crime one bigger than the other ..
Folk would have been fined for small events like Kiers ..
To Kiers defence he fessed up however not straight away ..
Sadly he doesn't recognise Ange after a few beers to be fair she is a quiet soul.. you'd never know she was there .. for me there's a slight smells of a gulity cover story that should have given police a warning..
But Boris was by far worse .as was his deception.
Both guilty though.
Reply With Quote