Quote Originally Posted by cyril evans awaydays View Post
I can understand your confusion/amusement.

As far as I can tell TWGL1 posted a set of deaths of people with Covid and no other underlying conditions in 2020. It may have been to prove the effectiveness of the control measures or to move onto hospitalisations of recovering groups and the impact that had on both health service management ond deferred treatment of others but then again...maybe not!

Still to nail his point about the ONS statistics that break deaths down into four "cohorts" the first being people aged 0-44 he explains that in an unspecified "cohort" they were 10 times more likely to be mauled to death by a dog than die with covid.

You, unsuprisingly, pissed yourself laughing only to be told again that you can't read data, backed up with what some would call a tell smiley.

Still, that's you told. Another bemused that we did not adopt the model that killed 10 times more Swedes than Norwegians before they locked down in early 2021 like the rest of the sane world at that time!
With regards to Norway, they submitted different data analysis to Sweden , they had a high death count prior to lockdown and the land mass/ per population differed - yet you failed to comment on that part.

ONS data is clearly being ignored here , funny that, ultimately heathy people have a 1:550,000 chance of dying.

Have a look at the data for dog attacks as a comparison ( granted bad choice for data comparison)