Quote Originally Posted by cyril evans awaydays View Post
So apart from the timeframe, the use of the wrong comparative populations, the failure to factor in the impact of preventative measures and the erroneous comparison with deaths by dog mauling we clearly don't understand data.

Still you got a big smiley from your chum so its all been worth it I suppose!
I misread the data as I was on a cell phone , furthermore, even when the data is corrected , it’s still extremely low risk, and if you manipulate the dog death data , you’re still more at risk from a dog attack, which must be horrific.

Now, I appreciate you probably in the higher risk group, but I’m not and neither are millions of others.

If anything like this happens again, I doubt they will do the same, however
no doubt, there will be selfish people, ( in my opinion ) who advocate it.

What’s you view on the links posted from Twitter , (excess deaths)I think it’s extremely worrying ?