The alternative theory is this - Lineker was found to be breech of IR35 tax laws by HMRC - it is to do with whether he is employed by the BBC or is an independent contractor (where he pays a lot less tax - as does the bbc). HMRC fined him 4.6 million , Lineker appealed the decision and the case is coming up very soon.Originally Posted by UNDERHILL1927
What's that got to do with it ...?
Simple - If the BBC win and prove they have control over what he does etc - HMRC will use this as a reference that he is in fact employed - and the fine stands. If Lineker is allowed to do what he wants regardless of what the BBC say - then his lawyers will use this as a case that he is in fact a contractor and try for the fine to be over turned.
High stakes for all concerned, Lineker will also have to pay costs if he loses. So to all concerned - it's not quite as it seems. Lineker tried using the defence that he does other work for other companies - but IR35 doesnt work like that and is ruled on a per contract basis.
Reply With Quote