
Originally Posted by
Tito Fuente
It's interesting that you started a thread by posting an article that you think backs up your opinion, only to then find out that you've misread it (or not read it at all) because it actually suggests that the BBC social media policy would already apply to freelancers (even though it's "ambiguous") and "Lineker is now, and will likely continue to be, a freelancer" was the verdict of the article that you were bigging up originally.
Then, without skipping a beat and without any fear of shame or humility, you decided that he must be guilty anyway - so I guess that we can discount the OP entirely as the article didn't actually say what you wanted it to say (i.e. that they think that Lineker is employed by the BBC)?
This feels like a familiar trait. May I ask, are you TWGL in disguise?