+ Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results

Thread: GLAMMY

  1. #5151

    Re: GLAMMY

    It doesn’t look a strong side on paper, but the last two games in particular have looked pretty comfortable. A fit Lloyd would help address the thin looking bowling attack (looks like Ingram’s bowling days must be over). If Van Der Gugten is fit, then I don’t see how he can be left out. Think Salter will come back when the leg spinner leaves (read somewhere he was only here for three games).

  2. #5152

    Re: GLAMMY

    Quote Originally Posted by Pearcey3 View Post
    It’s rare for Glammy to chase down such a large score with such ease. At Cardiff 189 is very much a top end score but they won so comfortably. Fair play to Ingram. I thought he was finished two seasons ago but he really is back to his best. Cooke has always been a high class batsman. He averages just under 40 in first class cricket. He and Ingram have now put on almost 300 undefeated runs in the past two games at something mad like 15 runs an over.
    Agree about Cooke being top class, championship wise he seems to be getting better if anything.

    Do think he's lacked intent in T20 for years mind, seemed to be content at run a ball and wait til over 18 year before hitting out. I'm guessing Alleyne has backed them to express themselves and Cooke seems to be one of the biggest beneficiaries. So nice to see him coming out and playing his shots

  3. #5153

    Re: GLAMMY

    I'd be looking to use Horton more this season - there aren't too many thirty seven year old wicketkeepers around these days and maybe we should think of using Cooke as a specialist batsman?

  4. #5154

    Re: GLAMMY

    Quote Originally Posted by the other bob wilson View Post
    I'd be looking to use Horton more this season - there aren't too many thirty seven year old wicketkeepers around these days and maybe we should think of using Cooke as a specialist batsman?
    If Horton could be fitted in it could definitely be worth looking at. As you correctly say, there aren't too many 37 year olds combining both. Must be a fair strain on the body, especially when combined with a long innings. I wonder if Cooke himself might be a bit reluctant to give up the gloves mind, considering it took him so long to get them off Wallace in the first place.

    Just had a Google of Mark Wallace to double check when cooke actually got the gloves. I hadn't actually realised they were so close in age, Wallace 41, Cooke 37. We did quite well as a club to keep Cooke as a specialist batsman for all those years, must've been a few counties sniffing around him with the offer of playing wicketkeeper.

  5. #5155

    Re: GLAMMY

    Quote Originally Posted by chrisp_1927 View Post
    If Horton could be fitted in it could definitely be worth looking at. As you correctly say, there aren't too many 37 year olds combining both. Must be a fair strain on the body, especially when combined with a long innings. I wonder if Cooke himself might be a bit reluctant to give up the gloves mind, considering it took him so long to get them off Wallace in the first place.

    Just had a Google of Mark Wallace to double check when cooke actually got the gloves. I hadn't actually realised they were so close in age, Wallace 41, Cooke 37. We did quite well as a club to keep Cooke as a specialist batsman for all those years, must've been a few counties sniffing around him with the offer of playing wicketkeeper.
    You might be right about Cooke not wanting to give up the gloves as I’m not seeing a decline in his standards, I’m just thinking of the strain it must be putting on his body.

    When Cooke first came into the team, I thought he was just a slogger, but I soon saw that wasn’t the case, he’s a proper batsman who could go in much higher up the order and seems better suited to opening than some of those we’ve tried in that position.

    Big game this afternoon with a danger of complacency from Glamorgan after Sussex stunk the place out in last night’s televised game with Hampshire.

  6. #5156

    Re: GLAMMY

    Quote Originally Posted by the other bob wilson View Post
    You might be right about Cooke not wanting to give up the gloves as I’m not seeing a decline in his standards, I’m just thinking of the strain it must be putting on his body.

    When Cooke first came into the team, I thought he was just a slogger, but I soon saw that wasn’t the case, he’s a proper batsman who could go in much higher up the order and seems better suited to opening than some of those we’ve tried in that position.

    Big game this afternoon with a danger of complacency from Glamorgan after Sussex stunk the place out in last night’s televised game with Hampshire.
    Would be nice to see Sussex's running between the wickets be the same today as it was last night! Hopefully the momentum just keeps rolling for us

  7. #5157

    Re: GLAMMY

    Another great power play for Glamorgan. 73/1 with the wicket for Carlson plus an Injury to Byrom. Watching with the sound off so not quite sure what happened to Byrom, hopefully not too serious

  8. #5158

    Re: GLAMMY

    Ingram out for 48, shame.
    Tiny ground so 200 plus seems a must.

  9. #5159

    Re: GLAMMY

    Hit on side of head with ball

  10. #5160

    Re: GLAMMY

    219-5 innings closed, Glamorgan have to be favourites, but it is a quick scoring ground.

  11. #5161

    Re: GLAMMY

    Sussex 220 to win.
    I think it's safe to say they've got it all to do!

    Ingram and Cooke superb.

  12. #5162

    Re: GLAMMY

    Quote Originally Posted by the other bob wilson View Post
    219-5 innings closed, Glamorgan have to be favourites, but it is a quick scoring ground.
    Yes. They have to go for it pretty much from the start so hopefully we can take a couple of early wickets.

  13. #5163

    Re: GLAMMY

    sorry but this Hatzoglou is rubbish correction total absolute rubbish

  14. #5164

    Re: GLAMMY

    This could be a very expensive game with both Byram and now Carlson going off injured.

  15. #5165

    Re: GLAMMY

    McIlroy is a very tidy bowler.

  16. #5166

    Re: GLAMMY

    Quote Originally Posted by Pearcey3 View Post
    McIlroy is a very tidy bowler.
    He's having a great season and seems to be improving game by game. Very good bowler

  17. #5167

    Re: GLAMMY

    Sounds like an excellent win under tricky circumstances

  18. #5168

    Re: GLAMMY

    Talking of bowlers, Carlson’s probably having his best season since the days when he first appeared in the team.

  19. #5169

    Re: GLAMMY

    Tough game tonight against Surrey. Byrom out, so looks like on of :ul Hasan, Taylor or gorvin will replace him. Interested who will join northeast to open. Must be a temptation to keep Carlson,Ingram and Cooke as 3,4 and 5 considering how well they are doing. Wouldn't mind seeing Douthwaite or root given a go at opening, or maybe ul Hasan considering he did well opening in the championship . A win tonight would set us up fantastically !

  20. #5170

    Re: GLAMMY

    Going to the game on Friday night. Hopefully we will get a good gate of 6000 plus.

  21. #5171

    Re: GLAMMY

    Frustratingly this is the 2nd time abbots been released back to Surrey without Neser being released back to us. Bloody Aussies!

  22. #5172

    Re: GLAMMY

    we're getting battered at home right now Surrey 91/0 after 9, 250 coming ☹️

  23. #5173

    Re: GLAMMY

    Quote Originally Posted by Taffy Blue in Berkshire View Post
    we're getting battered at home right now Surrey 91/0 after 9, 250 coming ☹️
    Well within our capabilities these days

  24. #5174

    Re: GLAMMY

    Douthwaite injured - Glamorgan players are dropping like flies.

  25. #5175

    Re: GLAMMY

    definitely gonna watch the footie rather than this debacle! woeful bowling and fielding.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •