Quote Originally Posted by JamesWales View Post
The thread could do with a long lie down, but just to perhaps leave it on some questions, it is black and white. And if it isn't, what part isn't?

Is the govt right to house people on barges?
Is the humanitarian process of asylum claims riddled with criminal abuse?
Is the positive test of legionella in one of hundreds of sites a sign of wider mismanagement?
Is the asylum process reaching those most in need or rewarding the fittest?
Should the UK house absolutely everyone who successfully applies for asylum here or are there limits?
Is it okay to be concerned for communities where people are housed?
Should asylum seekers receive housing over other people awaiting it?
Has leaving the EU made any difference?
Are current human rights laws fit for purpose?
Would the opposition do anything different?

There's an enormous amount of black and white issues in this debate. It's very very complex.
But apparently the "Only solution increasingly seems to involve leaving the ECHR if we are to have any control". Explain how the complexities of these issues are resolved by your solution and how the negative impacts on the Good Friday Agreement and the the Withdrawal Agreements with the EU can be mitigated. Then we can all join in and gaze in wonderment at the nuanced thinker you claim to be.