+ Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results |
Was in the running to become the third most powerful/influential person in the Church of England:
In January 2024, BBC News reported that Vennells had been shortlisted to become Bishop of London back in 2017, with two sources stating that the Archbishop of Canterbury himself had pushed her application and was regarded as a supporter of hers.
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-new...e-now-32860486
This guy is going for the jugular.
I don't think there is such a thing as a typical CEO job and can only speak from personal experience. In one of my jobs I worked for an organisation with about 3000 employees. Then the person at the top of the pyramid wouldn't have a clue what I was doing or who I was. What that person did is a mystery to me. When I worked for a smaller company with around 50 employees the CEO knew of everything. In the case of the Post Office there were around 60000 employees and I would not therefore have expected a CEO to get involved with the nitty gritty. That was the point I was making to reinforce my conclusion that Vennells was doubly culpable even though I think my minority opinion that she is putting up a reasonable defence of her untenable situation remains.
Perhaps you have a different experience although I fully expect you to disagree.
The nitty gritty to which I was referring was to do with the fact she was arranging meetings, deciding who should attend and the fact she took ownership of some of the minute details and not the entire Horizon problem to which she has to be involved. Of course she should have been involved with decisions relating to the prosecutions but that is not the point I was making.
You are correct in stating the majority of CEOs of large businesses have little or no knowledge of the day-to-day running of a business and on that basis you'd expect Vennells to be unaware of a few random complaints from disgruntled postmasters.
The problem is during Vennells' tenure this wasn't a few, scattered incidents. It was systematic - they prosecuted over 900 postmasters and had myriad complaints and MPs etc chasing them. It was being widely reported at the time. Constituency MPs were contacting her office. In short, she should and IMHO actually did know something was severely wrong. It was already a major public issue during her tenure. She should have been involved.
She is as guilty as you can be. She knew absolutely everything that went on in this shameful scandal.
Her answers and emotional breakdowns, are
Pathetic and embarrassing to watch.
If it was up to me, Id strip her of every penny she has, and put it the compensation pot, and jail her for a long time.
The Barristers and Lawyers are very clever.
Their questioning techniques are superb. On several occasions they'd ask her a seemingly open question, which she answers fairly confidently, but several questions later hit her with an email she sent or received, that proved she knew more than she earlier said she did.
It was great tv.
She was absolutely slaughtered by hislop on have I got news for you
We've all worked for people like Paula Vennells - they're everywhere. People who are over-promoted and lack both the morals and critical thinking skills to do the job they're paid for. That's why the public have so much empathy for those affected - because it could happen to us all
They, along with other people in the nhs should be up on corporate manslaughter charges. Their direct actions have led to the death of people.