+ Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Page 5 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 101 to 125 of 131

Thread: WW 111 ?

  1. #101

    Re: WW 111 ?

    Quote Originally Posted by TWGL1 View Post
    Lots of things can’t be proven that you probably believe in so it works both ways
    Same thing happened in the Russia collusion hoax. Lot's of insults followed by silence when they knew they were wrong. These people are cowards.

  2. #102

    Re: WW 111 ?

    Quote Originally Posted by Wales-Bales View Post
    He lost the argument and that's all he had left. Very sad, but it's the expected behaviour of a pseudo-intellectual.
    Believe they are superior to others and can only spend time with or be understood by equally special people.

  3. #103

    Re: WW 111 ?

    Quote Originally Posted by Wales-Bales View Post
    Same thing happened in the Russia collusion hoax. Lot's of insults followed by silence when they knew they were wrong. These people are cowards.
    Be critical of and look down on people they feel are not important.

  4. #104

    Re: WW 111 ?

    Some people can't escape their insecurities, no matter how well they think they might have done!

  5. #105

    Re: WW 111 ?

    Quote Originally Posted by Wales-Bales View Post
    Some people can't escape their insecurities, no matter how well they think they might have done!
    Be critical of and look down on people they feel are not important.

  6. #106

    Re: WW 111 ?

    There's nothing better than a nice bottle of red while watching somebody having a meltdown on a Saturday evening.


  7. #107

    Re: WW 111 ?

    Quote Originally Posted by Wales-Bales View Post
    There's nothing better than a nice bottle of red while watching somebody having a meltdown on a Saturday evening.

    Maybe you'll find your latest world view printed on the back of the bottle?
    Or is it like your current one - 0% proof?

  8. #108

    Re: WW 111 ?

    Quote Originally Posted by truthpaste View Post
    Maybe you'll find your latest world view printed on the back of the bottle?
    Or is it like your current one - 0% proof?
    I don't have views, only timelines, and they speak for themselves.

  9. #109

    Re: WW 111 ?

    Quote Originally Posted by Wales-Bales View Post
    I don't have views, only timelines, and they speak for themselves.
    Everyone has a view, however the majority don't wish to see it put to the test, as deep down they know it's built on sand.
    So let's have your take on 'timelines' - as that's all you seem to be offering?
    You can post the view of the person you heard it from, or a link, your call.

  10. #110

    Re: WW 111 ?

    Quote Originally Posted by truthpaste View Post
    Everyone has a view, however the majority don't wish to see it put to the test, as deep down they know it's built on sand.
    So let's have your take on 'timelines' - as that's all you seem to be offering?
    You can post the view of the person you heard it from, or a link, your call.
    I construct my own timelines using various sources of data and then I apply logical reasoning.

  11. #111

    Re: WW 111 ?

    Quote Originally Posted by Wales-Bales View Post
    I construct my own timelines using various sources of data and then I apply logical reasoning.
    You have convinced yourself that you are correct.
    So have the people in padded cells, bravo

  12. #112

    Re: WW 111 ?

    Quote Originally Posted by truthpaste View Post
    You have convinced yourself that you are correct.
    So have the people in padded cells, bravo
    You don't understand, all data points are assigned logical values and there is zero emotional attachment. Your assertion would only make sense if I was getting all of my information from a narrow band of biased media outlets, which is what most people actually do.

  13. #113
    International Citizen's Nephew's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2020
    Location
    Cardiff
    Posts
    5,824

    Re: WW 111 ?

    Quote Originally Posted by truthpaste View Post
    You have convinced yourself that you are correct.
    So have the people in padded cells, bravo
    That's regarded as offensive and stigmatising these days. Happy to help.

  14. #114

    Re: WW 111 ?

    more grim news coming out of the middle east this afternoon

    Al Arabiya says the strike against the fuel depot and oil refineries at the port of Al-Hudaydah in Yemen, was carried out jointly by Israel, the US, and the UK.

    The report also claims that 12 Israeli aircraft, including F-35 fighter jets, participated in the attack


  15. #115

    Re: WW 111 ?

    Quote Originally Posted by Wales-Bales View Post
    You don't understand, all data points are assigned logical values and there is zero emotional attachment. Your assertion would only make sense if I was getting all of my information from a narrow band of biased media outlets, which is what most people actually do.
    You have so much confidence in your opinion. So much that you dare not discuss it openly!
    There are many here that are waiting for a decent debate, sadly it looks like you (and you are not the first) will keep them waiting.

    While you try and gather enough 'gunpowder' to blow the lid off your thoughts, here is a real debate from two people who DID turn up. This will allow those who did buy popcorn for our debate to partly justify their purchase....

    The God Delusion Debate - Richard Dawkins vs John Lennox (preview)

  16. #116

    Re: WW 111 ?

    Quote Originally Posted by truthpaste View Post
    You have so much confidence in your opinion. So much that you dare not discuss it openly!
    There are many here that are waiting for a decent debate, sadly it looks like you (and you are not the first) will keep them waiting.

    While you try and gather enough 'gunpowder' to blow the lid off your thoughts, here is a real debate from two people who DID turn up. This will allow those who did buy popcorn for our debate to partly justify their purchase....

    The God Delusion Debate - Richard Dawkins vs John Lennox (preview)
    It's not an opinion, they are weighted three-valued logic data points applied to many sources of information over time. I unravelled the Russia collusion hoax fairly quickly, yet others who were glued to CNN and Rachael Maddow still couldn't work it out after six years!

  17. #117

    Re: WW 111 ?

    Quote Originally Posted by Wales-Bales View Post
    It's not an opinion, they are weighted three-valued logic data points applied to many sources of information over time. I unravelled the Russia collusion hoax fairly quickly, yet others who were glued to CNN and Rachael Maddow still couldn't work it out after six years!
    Not the "weighted three-valued logic data points" - how can I hope to counter such a powerful force?
    I may require 'International Rescue'

  18. #118

    Re: WW 111 ?

    Quote Originally Posted by truthpaste View Post
    Not the "weighted three-valued logic data points" - how can I hope to counter such a powerful force?
    I may require 'International Rescue'
    Well, you could try some System Dynamics data modelling if you are up to it, but that's a GIGO system that could be manipulated to reach a desired outcome, which is probably why some people like it.

  19. #119

    Re: WW 111 ?

    Quote Originally Posted by Wales-Bales View Post
    Well, you could try some System Dynamics data modelling if you are up to it, but that's a GIGO system that could be manipulated to reach a desired outcome, which is probably why some people like it.
    The last time I used 1.21 GIGAwatts I went to the first Elvis Concert; thankfully he was playing return to sender.

  20. #120

    Re: WW 111 ?

    Quote Originally Posted by truthpaste View Post
    The last time I used 1.21 GIGAwatts I went to the first Elvis Concert; thankfully he was playing return to sender.
    I'm being serious, you could probably put an entire country into lockdown for a couple of years if you input the right kind of wrong data.

  21. #121

    Re: WW 111 ?

    Quote Originally Posted by Wales-Bales View Post
    I'm being serious, you could probably put an entire country into lockdown for a couple of years if you input the right kind of wrong data.
    If you are serious, would you care to expand on your assertion?

  22. #122

    Re: WW 111 ?

    Quote Originally Posted by truthpaste View Post
    If you are serious, would you care to expand on your assertion?
    It's self-explanatory. System Dynamics software is used by governments and large organisations all over world to model various scenarios. However, it's only as good as the input data you feed it, i.e. entering inaccurate data will skew the output.

  23. #123

    Re: WW 111 ?

    Quote Originally Posted by Wales-Bales View Post
    It's self-explanatory. System Dynamics software is used by governments and large organisations all over world to model various scenarios. However, it's only as good as the input data you feed it, i.e. entering inaccurate data will skew the output.
    So given your success in solving the "Russia collusion hoax", what scenario should we anticipate during the coming months and years?

  24. #124
    International jon1959's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Sheffield - out of Roath
    Posts
    18,171

    Re: WW 111 ?


  25. #125

    Re: WW 111 ?

    Quote Originally Posted by jon1959 View Post

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •