
Originally Posted by
the other bob wilson
For me, the difference between last season and this can be gauged by the goals for and against columns. We may only have had four points from our first five matches in 23/24, but we'd scored eight and conceded ten. That goals against figure turned out to be a big clue that, for all Bulut's reputation as a defensive manager, our defending has got worse under him, but it's that goals for figure which is the overriding problem in my opinion and, let's face it, the writing was on the wall as far as that is concerned from about December last year. While I look at the squad and think that we should be doing better than we are, it seems to me that a strong argument can. be made in support of the argument that, with the long term injuries we have at present, we're worse off this season in the area of the team where we were weakest last season.
Having mentioned injuries, I think there are grounds for criticism of the club's transfer policy in that so many of our new signings have been a long way short of the fitness standards required and so we're still in the position where some of them look like they are in the process of being eased into first team contention. Yes, the club have been unlucky in some respects when it comes to the likes of El Ghazi. but we do also seem to have an awful lot of injuries to players who were here before this summer as well - given that we have looked less fit than every team we've played as well (is this down to the lack of pace in the squad that our manager was bemoaning straight after he'd had a three month window to do something about it?), does the club's playing conditioning and fitness training methods need to be looked at as well?