Quote Originally Posted by JamesWales View Post
Something is up if she has left. I think a lot of Labour MPs are a little miffed that she was seemingly parachuted in and has a lot of power. I can see their point to an extent.

Either way she should be pleased with her service. Her report largely saw to the end of Boris Johnson and set the Tories in downfall. She then got the Labour gig (a total coincidence) and managed to get her son on the candidate list and he is now an elected MP! (another coincidence).

I think her report was probably fair tbh, but her going straight to Labour stank and her son becoming an MP seems a little bit of an example of nepotism to me.
Nothing like a bit of post-hoc coincidence revisionism.

It was no coincidence that Johnson's apalling behaviour came under increasing scrutiny, indeed he brought it all on his own head. I remember giving you a previous challenge on which bits of the Gray report were biased so we could discuss. Met with silence.

Johnson lost office because he was frivolous and uncaring about the laws he put in place. He lied about his behaviour to Parliament, stuck up for a Whip who was a drunken letch and lost the support of his Parliamentary Party and Ministers such that he resigned in ignomy.

Starmer's judgement in appointing Gray to his office shows serious errors of his own judgement but your join the dots bit suggests you are still in denial about Johnson's justifiable defenestration by his own party!