+ Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Page 6 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast
Results 126 to 150 of 168

Thread: FT: LEEDS UNITED 7 (seven) - 0 CARDIFF CITY. Match thread

  1. #126

    Re: FT: LEEDS UNITED 7 (seven) - 0 CARDIFF CITY. Match thread

    Going to a back 3 when you’re getting ripped apart by wingers and full backs is genuinely insane.

    Bagan on at LCB was mental, Daland getting hooked again and Fish isn’t fancied. We need a centre half tomorrow or Monday.

    The rest, is basic stuff. That was appalling. Tactically, technically and mentally weak. Still, I didn’t expect us to get anything. I don’t think the full backs need to be singled out by anyone when they were all dreadful

  2. #127

    Re: FT: LEEDS UNITED 7 (seven) - 0 CARDIFF CITY. Match thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Pedro de la Rosa View Post
    Going to a back 3 when you’re getting ripped apart by wingers and full backs is genuinely insane.

    Bagan on at LCB was mental, Daland getting hooked again and Fish isn’t fancied. We need a centre half tomorrow or Monday.

    The rest, is basic stuff. That was appalling. Tactically, technically and mentally weak. Still, I didn’t expect us to get anything. I don’t think the full backs need to be singled out by anyone when they were all dreadful
    The hope is we didn't actually play full backs at full back in a 7 goal defeat. So maybe we should going forward play a genuine RB and LB.

    Such is the manner of this defeat though the entire coaching set up and all players should be completely embarrassed.

    Beaten before ko

  3. #128
    International
    Join Date
    Jan 2022
    Location
    North Cardiff ha ha
    Posts
    8,577

    Re: FT: LEEDS UNITED 7 (seven) - 0 CARDIFF CITY. Match thread

    Leeds is a very tough fixture along with Burnley, Sunderland, good job we haven't got them next when we are low in confidence after a stuffing, that would be terrible bad luck to have a run of fixtures like that.

  4. #129

    Re: LEEDS UNITED v CARDIFF CITY. Match thread

    Quote Originally Posted by the other bob wilson View Post
    Star Man......

  5. #130

    Re: FT: LEEDS UNITED 7 (seven) - 0 CARDIFF CITY. Match thread

    Quote Originally Posted by The Lone Gunman View Post
    I was born in March 1967, so today was the heaviest defeat in my lifetime, and that comes after the club’s worst-ever start to a league campaign.

    Fair play, these heroes of ours are breaking some records this season. It’s a good job they’re getting new contracts.
    I'm sure we conceded 7 to Luton away, and Jimmy Andrews was then sacked. In your lifetime.

    However, we might have scored one.


  6. #131

    Re: FT: LEEDS UNITED 7 (seven) - 0 CARDIFF CITY. Match thread

    Quote Originally Posted by rich munn View Post
    I'm sure we conceded 7 to Luton away, and Jimmy Andrews was then sacked. In your lifetime.

    However, we might have scored one.
    We did. Ray Bishop scored it. So that was a six-goal defeat. Not a seven-goal defeat. Today was the only seven-goal defeat in my lifetime. But not yours, old man. 😉

  7. #132

    Re: FT: LEEDS UNITED 7 (seven) - 0 CARDIFF CITY. Match thread

    Quote Originally Posted by The Lone Gunman View Post
    We did. Ray Bishop scored it. So that was a six-goal defeat. Not a seven-goal defeat. Today was the only seven-goal defeat in my lifetime. But not yours, old man. ��
    I do understand the meaning of heaviest defeat, which is why I posted as I did.

    However, we did concede 7, which I feel is relevant.

    Thanks for the ageist comment.


  8. #133

    Re: FT: LEEDS UNITED 7 (seven) - 0 CARDIFF CITY. Match thread

    Quote Originally Posted by rich munn View Post
    However, we did concede 7, which I feel is relevant.
    We conceded 7 at home to Cambridge in April 1994. But we scored 2 that day. So that was equally relevant/irrelevant (delete as applicable).

  9. #134

    Re: LEEDS UNITED v CARDIFF CITY. Match thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Tuerto View Post
    Star Man......
    There is no way you can have a “star man” in that performance the best you could give is -1. It was that bad.

  10. #135
    First Team
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Location
    Phoenix, AZ
    Posts
    1,701

    Re: LEEDS UNITED v CARDIFF CITY. Match thread

    I think the management needs to accept some the blame for that. We were set up with a high press that Leeds just skipped around and then were in on goal repeatedly. That was insane in the circumstances.

    Some the players really need to look at themselves too - El G in particular.

  11. #136

    Re: LEEDS UNITED v CARDIFF CITY. Match thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Cleve van Leef View Post
    There is no way you can have a “star man” in that performance the best you could give is -1. It was that bad.
    And the best worst man was ...

  12. #137

    Re: LEEDS UNITED v CARDIFF CITY. Match thread

    Quote Originally Posted by az city View Post
    I think the management needs to accept some the blame for that. We were set up with a high press that Leeds just skipped around and then were in on goal repeatedly. That was insane in the circumstances.

    Some the players really need to look at themselves too - El G in particular.
    Low block all day against Leeds, especially at their place. If you give them space to play they are virtually press resistant.

  13. #138

    Re: FT: LEEDS UNITED 7 (seven) - 0 CARDIFF CITY. Match thread

    Well our goal difference was improving, that couldn't continue.

    Shows where we really are as if many of us didn't already know.

  14. #139

    Re: LEEDS UNITED v CARDIFF CITY. Match thread

    Quote Originally Posted by az city View Post
    I think the management needs to accept some the blame for that. We were set up with a high press that Leeds just skipped around and then were in on goal repeatedly. That was insane in the circumstances.

    Some the players really need to look at themselves too - El G in particular.
    The talk on here was that we need to press and get at them.

    Hindsight eh.

  15. #140

    Re: FT: LEEDS UNITED 7 (seven) - 0 CARDIFF CITY. Match thread

    Quote Originally Posted by The Lone Gunman View Post
    We conceded 7 at home to Cambridge in April 1994. But we scored 2 that day. So that was equally relevant/irrelevant (delete as applicable).
    Relevant, obviously.

    "Heavy defeat" may not just be about the margin. Though statistically obsessed people may disagree. And good luck to them.


  16. #141

    Re: FT: LEEDS UNITED 7 (seven) - 0 CARDIFF CITY. Match thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Hilts View Post
    The hope is we didn't actually play full backs at full back in a 7 goal defeat. So maybe we should going forward play a genuine RB and LB.

    Such is the manner of this defeat though the entire coaching set up and all players should be completely embarrassed.

    Beaten before ko
    Rino and COD are full backs now. I'd be more concerned we've had to substitute Daland is 3 of his last 7 games because he's been that bad. Goutas has been here 18 months, he's been subbed twice, once for a striker as we were chasing the game, and once as he was injured. I am not writing Daland off but we cannot keep playing a liability.

    We didn't lose today because one player had a stinker, they were all dreadful. Daland didn't affect our midfielders treating it like a hot potato. A real bad day at the office and one that they should all have a long, hard look at themselves over.

  17. #142

    Re: FT: LEEDS UNITED 7 (seven) - 0 CARDIFF CITY. Match thread

    Everyone seems to be fixated on the fullbacks, I doubt many would have started either anyone other than Rino or ODowda.

    To say Rino is a midfielder is fair but he’s been excellent at fullback. ODowda hasn’t played regular as a winger since Morison. He’s signed a new 3 year deal basically as FB.

    Midfield or lack of was the issue, we basically invited them into us. The attacks were constant. NG and Bagan came on and did no better.

  18. #143

    Re: FT: LEEDS UNITED 7 (seven) - 0 CARDIFF CITY. Match thread

    Quote Originally Posted by rich munn View Post
    "Heavy defeat" may not just be about the margin. Though statistically obsessed people may disagree. And good luck to them.
    What are you gibbering about?

  19. #144

    Re: FT: LEEDS UNITED 7 (seven) - 0 CARDIFF CITY. Match thread

    Quote Originally Posted by rich munn View Post
    Relevant, obviously.

    "Heavy defeat" may not just be about the margin. Though statistically obsessed people may disagree. And good luck to them.

    Keep trying to dig yourself out of the hole you’ve created and you could reach Australia by the morning.

    Heaviest defeat has always meant the margin of defeat.

  20. #145

    Re: FT: LEEDS UNITED 7 (seven) - 0 CARDIFF CITY. Match thread

    Quote Originally Posted by The Lone Gunman View Post
    What are you gibbering about?
    Sorry you didn't understand.

    I'll try to be clearer for you in future.

    If you need any further explanation, I'll tell you in the pub.

  21. #146

    Re: FT: LEEDS UNITED 7 (seven) - 0 CARDIFF CITY. Match thread

    Quote Originally Posted by rich munn View Post
    I'm sure we conceded 7 to Luton away, and Jimmy Andrews was then sacked. In your lifetime.

    However, we might have scored one.

    Jimmy Andrew’s was sacked after a 4-1 home loss to Charlton a couple of months later.

  22. #147

    Re: FT: LEEDS UNITED 7 (seven) - 0 CARDIFF CITY. Match thread

    Quote Originally Posted by rich munn View Post
    Relevant, obviously.

    "Heavy defeat" may not just be about the margin. Though statistically obsessed people may disagree. And good luck to them.

    I’m struggling to think of a heavier CIty defeat in terms of the difference between the two teams that I’ve seen (maybe the 5:0 to Man City in 18/19?) - 7-0 flattered us.

  23. #148

    Re: FT: LEEDS UNITED 7 (seven) - 0 CARDIFF CITY. Match thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Pedro de la Rosa View Post
    Rino and COD are full backs now. I'd be more concerned we've had to substitute Daland is 3 of his last 7 games because he's been that bad. Goutas has been here 18 months, he's been subbed twice, once for a striker as we were chasing the game, and once as he was injured. I am not writing Daland off but we cannot keep playing a liability.

    We didn't lose today because one player had a stinker, they were all dreadful. Daland didn't affect our midfielders treating it like a hot potato. A real bad day at the office and one that they should all have a long, hard look at themselves over.
    In an ideal world, we'd be looking at two centre backs, neither if them are up to it

  24. #149
    International Heathblue's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Location
    Melmac, Aldente Nebula, Andromeda Galaxy
    Posts
    5,544

    Re: FT: LEEDS UNITED 7 (seven) - 0 CARDIFF CITY. Match thread

    With Brighton getting thumped 7.0, two 7.0 defeats on the same day, I doubt that it,s happened that many times before in the top 4 English divisions. I Don't think many thought much chance of getting anything from the game before it kicked off. 1.0 or 7.0, 0 points is 0 points and it's what was expected before the game, hopefully the team will have done enough that the goal difference isn't a relegation decider.

  25. #150

    Re: FT: LEEDS UNITED 7 (seven) - 0 CARDIFF CITY. Match thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Pedro de la Rosa View Post
    Going to a back 3 when you’re getting ripped apart by wingers and full backs is genuinely insane.

    Bagan on at LCB was mental, Daland getting hooked again and Fish isn’t fancied. We need a centre half tomorrow or Monday.

    The rest, is basic stuff. That was appalling. Tactically, technically and mentally weak. Still, I didn’t expect us to get anything. I don’t think the full backs need to be singled out by anyone when they were all dreadful
    I wonder if the coaching staff looked at any opposition match videos before this game?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •