Quote Originally Posted by truthpaste View Post
"One man who was clinically dead; then brought back to life accurately described what had been happening in the room"

Science can't explain the three minutes of awareness beyond the brain shutting down in this and many other cases:

Speaking to The Telegraph about the evidence provided by a 57-year-old social worker Southampton, Dr Parnia said: “We know the brain can’t function when the heart has stopped beating.

“But in this case, conscious awareness appears to have continued for up to three minutes.

“The man described everything that had happened in the room, but importantly, he heard two bleeps from a machine that makes a noise at three minute intervals. So we could time how long the experienced lasted for.

“He seemed very credible and everything that he said had happened to him had actually happened.”

The INDEPENDENT
I find it hugely tiresome when people make statements such as 'science can't explain' something.
Science is about knowledge and there are many scientific phenomena to be discovered yet.
Science is not a religious and immovable dogma despite many religious people trying to paint it as such.
Some scientists guess things wrongly, good scientists doubt their own findings, some may even be fraudulent - but all reputable scientists as far as I know declare that their knowledge is imperfect and there is always far more to be found out and to change their minds.
It is the antithesis of religion.