Quote Originally Posted by JamesWales View Post
It is easy in one sense. There are clear examples of protections for women being exploited essentially by men who dress as women - people who deserve protections but not necessarily those afforded to all women. Im not sure it clears up people who have had gender reassignment surgery and legally live as women though either does it? Or I may be wrong.
i think you are wrong, if you have someone with a 'note' and someone without a 'note' you now have 2 types of 'trans' , it clears it up by saying no 'trans' are women/men