+ Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 26 to 42 of 42

Thread: Simic gone

  1. #26

    Re: Simic gone

    Quote Originally Posted by J R Hartley View Post
    The loan includes an obligation to buy so it’s unlikely to turn a profit as how he does this season is largely irrelevant. We may have put down caveats on the fee depending on how he does this season but this is Cardiff City so I’d guess thats was most unlikely. After the season he had last year it’s more likely to be another loss.

    You’re talking like we are a premier league club with cash to burn and can just make signings with no intention of using them in our first team in the hope they will come good in the future and turn a profit.

    We are a club that’s making losses year on year, who don’t spend a lot on transfer fees and so if we are going to be making 7 figure sum signings I don’t think it’s unfair for fans to expect these players to be ready for our first team, not some fanciful “investment” hope that we bugger off to Belgium and we keep burning our fingers on time and time again,


    I’ve heard the loan fee is substantially higher than what you would call poor business.

    The option to buy would clear what we have currently paid ( €2m fee was based on significant add ons ) and give the club a nice profit.

    Thankfully it’s not my business but this transfer makes a good chatter on social media.

  2. #27

    Re: Simic gone

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr Ducie View Post
    I’ve heard the loan fee is substantially higher than what you would call poor business.

    The option to buy would clear what we have currently paid ( €2m fee was based on significant add ons ) and give the club a nice profit.

    Thankfully it’s not my business but this transfer makes a good chatter on social media.
    I find it very hard to believe we're going to make a profit on Simic, but, if we are then. credit to the club, as it will be a very rare case of them clearing up a mess of their own making.

  3. #28

    Re: Simic gone

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr Ducie View Post
    I’ve heard the loan fee is substantially higher than what you would call poor business.

    The option to buy would clear what we have currently paid ( €2m fee was based on significant add ons ) and give the club a nice profit.

    Thankfully it’s not my business but this transfer makes a good chatter on social media.
    Sounds like the sort of rubbish that Dalman would feed Abbondanto. I’m sorry, but I don’t believe for one second we are making profit on a years long loan compared to what we signed him permanently for.

  4. #29

    Re: Simic gone

    Quote Originally Posted by J R Hartley View Post
    Sounds like the sort of rubbish that Dalman would feed Abbondanto. I’m sorry, but I don’t believe for one second we are making profit on a years long loan compared to what we signed him permanently for.
    profit would be if he moves there permanently

  5. #30

    Re: Simic gone

    Even if we do make a profit, we really needed a striker last season. That's what they should have spent their money on. We might even have stayed up and not taken the hit in revenue!

  6. #31
    International City123's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Cardiff
    Posts
    11,350

    Re: Simic gone

    Quote Originally Posted by Rjk View Post
    you're obsessed with deboys I think 90% of the time he's been mentioned on here it's in your posts.
    in reality we don't know what's going on inside the club and where to apportion blame/credit for any signings.

    as for Simic we bought him for €2m so what Ł1.75m? and the club obviously thought he had potential to increase in value. if we end up getting that much from the German club from a loan fee and future transfer fee then it would hardly have been a disaster. even if we end up eating a modest loss it's worth the gamble from time to time for the time that it comes off and you make a lot of money.

    I'm not saying it's been a successful move btw it's more like a side investment that hasn't delivered any return yet. he was clearly never in our plans for the first team for this season.
    Surely you see how spending over a million on a "side investment" for a club in our situation is ridiculous though, right?

  7. #32

    Re: Simic gone

    Quote Originally Posted by Undercoverinwurzelland View Post
    Even if we do make a profit, we really needed a striker last season. That's what they should have spent their money on. We might even have stayed up and not taken the hit in revenue!
    This is the right answer. Even if we don't lose money on the deal (and I share the skepticism of many that is the case), we spent a significant chunk of our money on a solution to our biggest problem, who then never played for us and we went down.

    It's another sign of a truly terribly run club, making our money back on his eventual exit won't change that.

  8. #33

    Re: Simic gone

    Quote Originally Posted by Rjk View Post
    profit would be if he moves there permanently
    Sorry but I don’t believe for one second that we will be making any profit on this deal.ive read elsewhere it’s a loan deal with an obligation to take over his contract in 12 months, Who knows, but imo the player has done absolutely nothing in his short time here, or even his career, to warrant a smaller Bundesliga 2 club who don’t usually spend money to be paying a loan fee AND then a permanent signing fee. Karlusher have only ever made 5 signings over 1m in their entire history and 3 of them were in the last century.

    It sounds like a load of cobblers being put out by the club through their usual sycophants who are desperate to be itk.

  9. #34

    Re: Simic gone

    My reading of the "club signing" moniker was that it was a way of the club using up the remaining headroom that they had within the FFP system. There was a 3 year averaging period over which their cumulative loss was limited - by using their capital to invest in an asset they could re-sell means they could claim whatever loan/sale fee as profit in a later window. Might be way off there, and there's a chance that the logic above was a last resort (I assume they would have been happier if it had worked out and he was a decent first team asset).

  10. #35

    Re: Simic gone

    Quote Originally Posted by J R Hartley View Post
    Sorry but I don’t believe for one second that we will be making any profit on this deal.ive read elsewhere it’s a loan deal with an obligation to take over his contract in 12 months, Who knows, but imo the player has done absolutely nothing in his short time here, or even his career, to warrant a smaller Bundesliga 2 club who don’t usually spend money to be paying a loan fee AND then a permanent signing fee. Karlusher have only ever made 5 signings over 1m in their entire history and 3 of them were in the last century.

    It sounds like a load of cobblers being put out by the club through their usual sycophants who are desperate to be itk.
    Why do you insist on taking the reasonable debate and making an idiot out of yourself?, It’s what the “usual sycophants “ have been told. Time will tell in the next financial year if the sycophants are correct.

    Mr BTEC nobody.

  11. #36

    Re: Simic gone

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr Ducie View Post
    Why do you insist on taking the reasonable debate and making an idiot out of yourself?, It’s what the “usual sycophants “ have been told. Time will tell in the next financial year if the sycophants are correct.

    Mr BTEC nobody.
    You’d know all about being a sycophant, J. How is Mr Santa Ponsa these days?

    Btec Carl Curtis

  12. #37

    Re: Simic gone

    Quote Originally Posted by J R Hartley View Post
    You’d know all about being a sycophant, J. How is Mr Santa Ponsa these days?

    Btec Carl Curtis
    Why don’t you ask him yourself , not spoken to the chap for ten years, and know me personally on a day to day basis do you ?

    Shut up with your nonsense

  13. #38

    Re: Simic gone

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr Ducie View Post
    Why don’t you ask him yourself , not spoken to the chap for ten years, and know me personally on a day to day basis do you ?

    Shut up with your nonsense
    You need to shut up with your ITK nonsense. You’re over 50 years old. Get a grip. Leave the social media to the kids.

  14. #39

    Re: Simic gone

    Quote Originally Posted by J R Hartley View Post
    You need to shut up with your ITK nonsense. You’re over 50 years old. Get a grip. Leave the social media to the kids.
    Why are you so upset with a simple post ? I don’t understand why you’re so mad at a post on a message board, Do you think I know anything more than anyone else , it’s just what someone else told me. I don’t claim to be in the know , that’s not my style, and wind your neck in.

    Thanks.

  15. #40

    Re: Simic gone

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr Ducie View Post
    Why are you so upset with a simple post ? I don’t understand why you’re so mad at a post on a message board, Do you think I know anything more than anyone else , it’s just what someone else told me. I don’t claim to be in the know , that’s not my style, and wind your neck in.

    Thanks.
    I’m not upset about anything. It’s my opinion. I choose not to believe the nonsense I think you’re spouting about making a profit on this guy.

  16. #41

    Re: Simic gone

    Quote Originally Posted by J R Hartley View Post
    I’m not upset about anything. It’s my opinion. I choose not to believe the nonsense I think you’re spouting about making a profit on this guy.
    Fine , that’s what a football discussion board is all about , now as I say wind your neck in BTEc.


  17. #42

    Re: Simic gone

    Is BTtec a possible BBM signing to replace AR & JR?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •