Quote Originally Posted by cyril evans awaydays View Post
Perhaps the point that you are not willing to grasp is how uncritically you parrotted a quoted figure when it embelishes a point you are trying to make compared with how much research you do to try and disprove someone else's point of view.

In this case the Times produced an article quoting losses to defense suppliers that was then inflated by the really poor LBC article which you were happy to regurgitate and quote as if it was fact whilst still considering yourself the great balancer.
As an exercise in missing the point and doing so in a pompous manner, I give you an A+ here. Da Iawn.

Quite clearly it's not about the exact cost which runs into millions. I've seen several figures; £7m, £25m, £30m and £55m. None of which are acceptable. I suspect the Maniacs Murder Cult have cost us next to nothing and they are rightly proscribed too. Sharing an article that states £30m is not "parroting". If it is then I look forward to you making that claim consistently. Of course, you won't do this.

It's UK military hardware that a group are targeting to try and force political change. As I said, if you cant see how that can lead to a proscribed group then that surprises me. That said, I wouldn't be surprised in your case Cyril if you actually think you do know more than the MOD and UK govt lawyers!

They broke in and caused serious damage to UK military planes cos of Palestine. They showed no indication of a change in that policy. They got proscribed. Wholly agree with it or not, agree with the wider ideological position or not, it's not a complex thing to grasp and that's my essential point.