+ Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results |
Can't find anything about this season, but I found this about last season.
https://www.fourfourtwo.com/features...bs-are-allowed
The definition of u21 then was "any player born on or after January 1 2004", so presumably that's Jan 1 2005 now. That would mean neither of them can be counted as u21.
I'm not advocating that we sign Hanley, but we definitely need someone in that Morrison/Flint-type mould in this league.
There'll be games (at home) where we have a lot of the ball and teams sit deep, and that's fine. But there'll be games (likely away) where teams will have a big ****er up top and they'll just pummel crosses and long balls into them for 90 mins. Unless Daland sorts himself out, we haven't currently got any centre backs that can handle that type of physicality.
That just means they need to have been registered with a club in England or Wales for three years before they reach a certain age. We would have very few non home grown players in our squad.
Even Robertson who is an Aussie would be considered home grown due to his time spent at man city
Here are the rules for this season, from the EFL Handbook. It is as thought:
44.9 Squad Lists
44.9.1 Clubs shall be permitted to name up to a maximum number of Players in their Squad List based on the following provisions:
...
(b) in respect of League One and Two Clubs 22 Players of which a minimum of 8 must be a Home Grown Player.
44.9.2 The following Players do not need to be included in the Squad List to be eligible to play in League matches:
...
(b) in respect of League One Clubs and League Two Clubs:
(i) any Under 21 Players; and
(ii) goalkeepers.
Definitions
...
For Season 2025/26 an Under 21 Player is someone born on or after 1 January 2005.
https://images.gc.eflservices.co.uk/...502a343283.pdf
I came to the same conclusion. Was it ignorance of the rules or an attempt to cover up cost cutting and was found out
Just shows we have ZERO basic common sense football knowledge on the board.
As someone who works in a complex technical field I have to regularly explain to non-technical executives why things take so long and why we need x,y, and z. It's challenging for me... but it must be an absolute nightmare for City managers when faced with the most fundamental lack of football knowledge from the people holding all the power at the club.
My understanding is that we have to cut salary costs to below 60% of income, to comply with League 1/2 finance rules. Can anyone confirm that? It might explain why we are getting rid of all but a few of the big earners.
Yes, those are the rules for league one.
our income will drop by 6-10m and we probably would have had a salary to income of higher than 60%
if we had an income of around 24m and a wage bill of say 22m previously.
then we might be looking at a new income of 16m and therefore would need the wage bill to reduce to less than 10m