Quote Originally Posted by stevo View Post
That was due to the fact that you didn't watch the whole video and therefore not take on board all the evidence and quickly made up your mind.



https://www.researchgate.net/publica...mar_Sky_Survey

https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-6347224/v1



Regarding the pyramid structures, I'm not aware of any paper either. However, the team have developed their own patented solution and I'm guessing they want to keep the details of that under wraps at least for the time being. But that was an interesting case because when they made an announcement, people were quick to debunk it saying SAR can't penetrate levels that deep. But if anyone spent more than two minutes looking into their claims, they would have seen that the team weren't claiming that SAR was being used in that way at all - instead using SAR to detect acoustic vibrations rising to the surface of the Giza plateau. And it was the differences in those acoustic vibrations that suggested differences in the structure below the pyramid. They have used this technology to map out tunnels under mountain ranges, which we know are there. So, there is some credence to all this.

Next week I think we should discuss Materialism vs Idealism. That should be even more fun.
What is a 'patented solution'?
Patents tend to pertain to invented technology that is original and which receives protection from those wishing to copy or use it for a specified period. From my time working in the field of Intellectual Property, I can't recalling it having a role in ancient historical discoveries.
Has the team concerned submitted and eventually had approved a patent of some description in the course of their research and specifically relating to technology they developed? If so, what relevance is that pattern to publishing historical evidence? And what is the specific information that you base your 'guessing' on?