Quote Originally Posted by stevo View Post
I'm sorry. I've just lost all interest in this conversation. You're focussing on the side issues of peer reviews (or lack of) rather than the topic of conversation yourself. Besides, the peer review system is heavily flawed. As someone who has worked in a Russell Group University for 34 years, I know how research is funded. And for both research grants and and peer review, good luck trying to get something published that challenges the agreed narratives. The odds are stacked against you from the start.

The last thing I'll say on this topic is that the widely anticipated Jesse Michel's video covering the Nazca mummies that I posted above was released yesterday. Interestingly, John McDowell is featured in that who clearly isn't dismissing this whole subject.
I am trying to take into account peer review as the view of experts in the field, a field that I am no expert in myself, hold some gravitas regarding scientific theories and data.

Just swallowing whole online videos is not my bag - and I remember you posting a link not so long ago by someone who was an experienced hoaxer.

If you post links and videos on here you should be prepared to accept searching questions about the subject matter concerned (and most posters ignore them!).

Good science should be open to scrutiny by all and sundry.