If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Next match: Pre-season. Saturday, July 11th | FC Midtjylland (H) @ Cardiff City Stadium, 12:30pm -
All pre-season fixtures
Originally posted by the other bob wilsonView Post
Tories have lowered expectations to such an extent that 800 losses will be portrayed as not that bad - that’s codswallop, but will Labour really be that pleased with their showing? Good results for Lib Dems and Greens.
i think labour will definitely be pleased, the drop in tory support is quite dramatic, and lib dem / green always do better in local elections than at a general election
i think labour will definitely be pleased, the drop in tory support is quite dramatic, and lib dem / green always do better in local elections than at a general election
Yes, it’s beginning to look like I drew my conclusions too early. According to the BBC, Labour gains are now edging towards 500 and Conservative losses are over 900 with twenty four councils still to declare.
Visit BBC News for up-to-the-minute news, breaking news, video, audio and feature stories. BBC News provides trusted World and UK news as well as local and regional perspectives. Also entertainment, business, science, technology and health news.
Originally posted by the other bob wilsonView Post
Yes, it’s beginning to look like I drew my conclusions too early. According to the BBC, Labour gains are now edging towards 500 and Conservative losses are over 900 with twenty four councils still to declare.
some people were predicting a swing of 5% to labour given the mix of constituencies that were being contested - they've got 9%. it's pretty terrible for the Tories, expect unruly backbenchers
Tories over one thousand losses now - this was the figure they were talking about so that they could say they didn’t do too badly when they only lost eight hundred (which is the sort of figure they were really expecting to lose). These are terrible results for the Conservatives if that loss figure stays at current levels (there’s still twelve councils still to declare).
The English local election results are utterly dire for the Tories. Rishi Sunak’s first electoral test since he became prime minister went very badly for him. The Conservatives have lost hundreds of seats in every part of England., and this was in areas where they did very badly last time and therefore should not have...
One needs to take the blinkers off and see the bigger picture
The English local election results are utterly dire for the Tories. Rishi Sunak’s first electoral test since he became prime minister went very badly for him. The Conservatives have lost hundreds of seats in every part of England., and this was in areas where they did very badly last time and therefore should not have...
One needs to take the blinkers off and see the bigger picture
I dislike this version of labour but the cold hard fact is this has been a big success for them.
However, I think someone else posted in this thread, I think Labour are only getting more votes because they aren't tory rather than coming up with actual reasons people should vote for them.
The English local election results are utterly dire for the Tories. Rishi Sunak’s first electoral test since he became prime minister went very badly for him. The Conservatives have lost hundreds of seats in every part of England., and this was in areas where they did very badly last time and therefore should not have...
One needs to take the blinkers off and see the bigger picture
It's a dilemma what is the most ironic, your posting history or your avatar?
I dislike this version of labour but the cold hard fact is this has been a big success for them.
However, I think someone else posted in this thread, I think Labour are only getting more votes because they aren't tory rather than coming up with actual reasons people should vote for them.
totally.
that is good enough to win them the general election though the way we are going
The English local election results are utterly dire for the Tories. Rishi Sunak’s first electoral test since he became prime minister went very badly for him. The Conservatives have lost hundreds of seats in every part of England., and this was in areas where they did very badly last time and therefore should not have...
One needs to take the blinkers off and see the bigger picture
Socialist Worker. Haven't read that for a while. I see within the first few paragraphs they are already manufacturing the idea of ranpant fascism!
I genuinely wouldn't read much into this. Its local elections. It was a very good night for Labour and a very bad one for the Tories. It's a bit like looking at the League Cup and determing league form based on that.
Labour are still set for government but the polls are tightening and likely to tighten more as more favourable economic winds benefit Sunak and the reality of campaigning kicks in.
The one thing that you can be sure of about the great British public is that the one thing they don't like is politicians who gloat and take the electorate for granted by making statements like Starmer did indicating they think they have already won the next general election. As for the Lib Dems, they fall for it every time - win some seats and councils, think they are the best thing since sliced bread and then disappear without trace at the next main election.
It says, 'about a quarter of people of working-age - around 10 million people - don't currently have jobs,' then later on, 'officially, about 1.3 million people in the UK were unemployed.'
Effectively then, there's really approaching 8 times more working-age people who are unemployed than what the official figures - which is defined and manipulated by government setting a very narrow criteria - would have us believe.
I dislike this version of labour but the cold hard fact is this has been a big success for them.
However, I think someone else posted in this thread, I think Labour are only getting more votes because they aren't tory rather than coming up with actual reasons people should vote for them.
I dislike this version of labour but the cold hard fact is this has been a big success for them.
However, I think someone else posted in this thread, I think Labour are only getting more votes because they aren't tory rather than coming up with actual reasons people should vote for them.
That's generally been the way of it for years.
1997 was arguably the last time we had an election where people really voted for something positive.
The Tories got back in with a coalition in 2010 as Labour's time had run its course, bit like what is happening to them now.
Theresa May managed to blow a huge lead in the polls and people forget that Jeremy Corbyn managed to increase Labour's support to the point where May lost her overall control over Westminster and had to fork out lots of wonga to buy out the DUP.
People voted for Boris Johnson because he was popular with the public, probably because he'd shagged about 17% of them.
Since then, the further right of the Tory party have made their move on the back of Johnson's popularity, resulting in Truss's failed government in record time and plummeting in the polls.
Comment