Are these two for real?

[az city]

Re: Are these two for real?

This reads like an AI response.

I. Don't. Think. It's. Good. To. Keep. Dividing. Us. Up. By.Our.Racial.Characteristics.

It's divisive. And it's a mistake to do it.

YOU. DON'T. KNOW. WHAT. YOU. ARE. TALKING. ABOUT.

[az city]

Re: Are these two for real?

Here we go again. Your statement is inherently racist because it dismisses the importance of acknowledging racial origin and the systemic inequalities that come with it. By expressing frustration with discussions about race, it implies that addressing racial issues is unnecessary or divisive, which ignores the lived experiences of marginalised communities.

Suggesting that this focus on race is something to "tire of" perpetuates the idea that concerns about racial and social justice are trivial or overblown. This mindset effectively silences important conversations about race, reinforcing the status quo and contributing to the ongoing marginalisation of those who face racial discrimination.

And round and round we go.

We've been over and over and over this and we'll continue to do it until you understand that you're 'being racist' without actually realising it or meaning to be.

I'm sure you'll understand why if you think hard enough.

Excellent post. I just wish Jimbo would actually reflect for just an hour or so.

[JamesWales]

Re: Are these two for real?

No you are mistaken

I think your general MO on here is ....

Like Hitler reading an article by ghengis Khan and agreeing with

Not that article you posted , that's just exhibit 24 among a long list provided by you to say .....hey I am not right wing ! .....whilst posting , printing and commenting on every fecking thread to kiss the arse of the right

My advice would be actually TRY and be moderate for a while as at present it's a bit of a giveaway

You are the only one on most of these threads doing what you do and its either you can't see it or you know you won't allow yourself to be wrong

It's mostly the latter , obviously

Problem is Sludge you are a very difficult man to engage with.

If someone objects to you saying the most disgusting things about people like Nadine Dorries or Priti Patel then you label them far right

If someone is like 75% of adults and didn't vote Labour you label them Tory boys

If someone dares to share an article from a centrist magazine that explores the rioters motivations and you label them fascists

If you think 750,000 a year net immigration is too high you label them Tory scum

The list goes on and on. Most of those things are pretty moderate positions.

I don't even know where you stand on most things because one has to battle through the orbit of flying insults and random rages to get to the crux of it.

[Elwood Blues]

Re: Are these two for real?

I can't speak for anybody else but in my case you have got that completely wrong because I have been calling for the winter fuel allowance to be means tested for a few years now and would have quite happily supported the decision to do so regardless of party.

Fine. And I will respond to this more fully on the winter fuel allowance thread where I have a couple of your posts I need to respond to when I next use my PC later today.

But why didn't you just clarify what I meant on that thread

I am quite approachable.

[SLUDGE FACTORY]

Re: Are these two for real?

Problem is Sludge you are a very difficult man to engage with.

If someone objects to you saying the most disgusting things about people like Nadine Dorries or Priti Patel then you label them far right

If someone is like 75% of adults and didn't vote Labour you label them Tory boys

If someone dares to share an article from a centrist magazine that explores the rioters motivations and you label them fascists

If you think 750,000 a year net immigration is too high you label them Tory scum

The list goes on and on. Most of those things are pretty moderate positions.

I don't even know where you stand on most things because one has to battle through the orbit of flying insults and random rages to get to the crux of it.

More verbal cabbage disguising your default right wing defence mode

Bores me and bores everyone else too , most people just sensibly give up

[JamesWales]

Re: Are these two for real?

More verbal cabbage disguising your default right wing defence mode

Bores me and bores everyone else too , most people just sensibly give up

Not so bored that you couldn't come on and prove my point for me. Cheers bro!

[Taunton Blue Genie]

Re: Are these two for real?

More verbal cabbage disguising your default right wing defence mode

Bores me and bores everyone else too , most people just sensibly give up

Oh, the irony!

[SLUDGE FACTORY]

Re: Are these two for real?

Oh, the irony!

Up yours Mr moribund

[SLUDGE FACTORY]

Re: Are these two for real?

Not so bored that you couldn't come on and prove my point for me. Cheers bro!

Feck off bro

[the other bob wilson]

Re: Are these two for real?

Actually in respect of nuance, what happens here is that some of you present an often very left-wing position and therefore any criticism of it or attempt to introduce centrist or right of centre views is deemed as an endorsement of those, whereas it is normally more of a criticism of the starting position.

In fairness, this thread started better than many, but it still invited us to agree how lovely these democratic candidates are.

You’ve already said that you’d vote for Trump though and as your car has a fault which always automatically takes your so called middle of the road driving way off to the right, you’re hardly an impartial observer are you - as your use of an article that seriously accuses Walz of lying over how spicy or otherwise he likes his tacos :facepalm:proves.

[Dorcus]

Re: Are these two for real?

You’ve already said that you’d vote for Trump though and as your car has a fault which always automatically takes your so called middle of the road driving way off to the right, you’re hardly an impartial observer are you - as your use of an article that seriously accuses Walz of lying over how spicy or otherwise he likes his tacos :facepalm:proves.

I know he already has a problem with his political gimbal but I've also noticed he has a fault with his steering wheel. It could be something as easy to fix as a loose tie rod or a worn ball joint. I'd fix the problem for him free of charge but I haven't got the necessary skill. However, I can recommend a mechanic I use regularly whose pricing is very fair 👍

[Heathblue]

Re: Are these two for real?

To get back on topic, someone wrote a half decent speech for knee pads, I'm not sure she'll actually be the nominee although it's getting a bit late for another pivot. 5 years ago she dropped out when at 2% in the selection process, she's never been popular amongst the Democrat base, even CNN has been ripping her a new one this past week.

[cyril evans awaydays]

Re: Are these two for real?

To get back on topic, someone wrote a half decent speech for knee pads, I'm not sure she'll actually be the nominee although it's getting a bit late for another pivot. 5 years ago she dropped out when at 2% in the selection process, she's never been popular amongst the Democrat base, even CNN has been ripping her a new one this past week.

Ha Ha Nels is a secret CNN curtain twitcher!

[delmbox]

Re: Are these two for real?

To get back on topic, someone wrote a half decent speech for knee pads, I'm not sure she'll actually be the nominee although it's getting a bit late for another pivot. 5 years ago she dropped out when at 2% in the selection process, she's never been popular amongst the Democrat base, even CNN has been ripping her a new one this past week.

Bet you £100 that she'll be the nominee

[SLUDGE FACTORY]

Re: Are these two for real?

Who is knee pads ?