Tweet
Posted without comment.
-
-
Re: Zuckerberg
-
Re: Zuckerberg
30 minutes in.
Not mind blowing but pretty wild as to what he has come against.
Is he falling in line because of the new administration or does he believe in community notes?
He says that X is doing a better job.
Right now at this moment in time, I would be incredibly supirsied if any of these revelations can or will change steadfast minds…just blown off by cynicism, which I admit to having towards Zuckerberg at the moment.
Then of course there is the Joe Rogan factor and people certainly love to shoot down a platform.
It’s a shame that James O’Brian can’t get him on LBC.Comment
-
Re: Zuckerberg
Where we’re headed?
The OP has spent years telling us that the world is being run by an unelected “elite” who were supposed to be behind virtually every negative event that was happening. When there is pretty convincing evidence that something similar is happening in what is, arguably, still the most powerful country in the world. Furthermore, the richest man in the world is being referred to as a kind of Vice President elect who is openly working to undermine foreign democracies despite having never stood for political office in his life, he comes across as being supportive of it - suppose it all depends on whether he likes the “elite” involved or not.Comment
-
Re: Zuckerberg
Ok Whataboutery it is.Originally posted by the other bob wilson View PostWhere we’re headed?
The OP has spent years telling us that the world is being run by an unelected “elite” who were supposed to be behind virtually every negative event that was happening. When there is pretty convincing evidence that something similar is happening in what is, arguably, still the most powerful country in the world. Furthermore, the richest man in the world is being referred to as a kind of Vice President elect who is openly working to undermine foreign democracies despite having never stood for political office in his life, he comes across as being supportive of it - suppose it all depends on whether he likes the “elite” involved or not.
What about Channel 4 not showing their documentary about Muslim Rape Gangs due to political pressure.
What about George Soros?
Is there any point in having a good faith conversation with you?Comment
-
Re: Zuckerberg
Looks like the Smug Club were right again
Comment
-
Re: Zuckerberg
Explain why this latest group of "elites" out to line their over stuffed pockets are any better than the last lot and I might begin to understand. To my mind, they're all the same, but Wales Bales clearly thinks differently.Originally posted by Wash DC Blue View PostComment
-
Re: Zuckerberg
Wake up Bob, now is not a good time to have an obsessive mindset.Originally posted by the other bob wilson View PostWhere we’re headed?
The OP has spent years telling us that the world is being run by an unelected “elite” who were supposed to be behind virtually every negative event that was happening. When there is pretty convincing evidence that something similar is happening in what is, arguably, still the most powerful country in the world. Furthermore, the richest man in the world is being referred to as a kind of Vice President elect who is openly working to undermine foreign democracies despite having never stood for political office in his life, he comes across as being supportive of it - suppose it all depends on whether he likes the “elite” involved or not.
Comment
-
Re: Zuckerberg
Zucks is a weasel, but the Russia collusion hoaxers among us did love a good factcheck to maintain their false realities!Originally posted by TWGL1 View PostLooks like the Smug Club were right againComment
-
-
Re: Zuckerberg
This 'post truth' and 'alternate fact' world needs fact checking more than ever.
Actual facts. Properly checked.
It might also help some of our regular paranoid, alt-right, obsessives with their triangulation.
More work needed there!
But 100% correct with 'Zucks is a weasel'.Comment
-
Re: Zuckerberg
Good grief, an admission you haven’t got a clue about something, I never thought I’d live to see the day.Originally posted by Wales-Bales View PostWake up Bob, now is not a good time to have an obsessive mindset.
https://www.ccmb.co.uk/showthread.ph...=1#post5564460Comment
-
Re: Zuckerberg
Alas, we've always lived in a world when facts were massively distorted. Many absolute facts from the Soviet era were only corrected in the late 80s and early 90s for example. I am sure in reality we live in a world where the truth is more available than ever.Originally posted by jon1959 View Post
Unfortunately social media has changed things as mistruths or perhaps more accurately distortions of the truth can spread like wildfire.
In this case, I think the role of fact checkers themselves became politicized. The community notes system on X really isn't that bad to be honest. It allows users to intervene and provide context and corrections and is applied across the board.
It's not easy though. Some facts are absolute - the capital of Spain in Madrid for example, but most facts are like statistics; easily manipulated and easy to present in slightly different ways to further one cause or otherComment
-
Re: Zuckerberg
I do have a clue and I have already mapped out both pathsOriginally posted by the other bob wilson View Post
Comment
-
Re: Zuckerberg
im presuming that this is the interview in which Zuck tells Rogan that the Biden admin asked him to censor during COVID ? I've seen that part of an interview, then a few of your besties on here will still deny it and call it conspiracy 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 drip drip drip, flood gates opening Shortly.Originally posted by Wales-Bales View PostI do have a clue and I have already mapped out both pathsComment
Comment