Runcorn by election.

[Eric Cartman]

Re: Runcorn by election.

No , pay attention

If labour get rid of starmer they should get enough of a boost to win the most seats

The bloke is toxic , weak and you might not see he's driving people away but those on the doorstep do

I don't know any labour voters who think hes anything but a complete let down

And if labour voters think he's hopeless then it's obvious those on the fringes have an even lower opinion of him

The core voters are not backing him ......you can go on playing the game of philosophical chess and yeah but no but in the same way Cardiff City sleepwalked into relegation then suddenly were powerless to stop it .....Starmer and Labour are taking us in the nightmare of a right wing government in rapid time

So you aren't willing to say which policies you agree or disagree with?

I just don't understand why someone would be politically engaged enough to waste so much time posting about politics on the internet and not have any kind of thoughts about the direction they want the country to go in.

I'm not really interested in the Punch and Judy bullshit and I certainly won't judge a government based on how 'charismatic' they are.

[SLUDGE FACTORY]

Re: Runcorn by election.

So you aren't willing to say which policies you agree or disagree with?

I just don't understand why someone would be politically engaged enough to waste so much time posting about politics on the internet and not have any kind of thoughts about the direction they want the country to go in.

I'm not really interested in the Punch and Judy bullshit and I certainly won't judge a government based on how 'charismatic' they are.

I have told you several times what policies are clearly going to sink the labour party , you must be either incredibly dull or being deliberately stupid if you are saying you are not aware what those are

Rachel Reeves and Liz Kendal are responsible for implementing policies which have caused huge mistrust and have stabbed in the back those that voted Labour in

Now you can go on about reducing public spending , the benefits bill , welfare till you are Blue in the face .....sic .....but at a time when labour needs every vote it can get as reform flexes it's muscles what labour have done is shot itself in the foot to appease the right wing .....who we now know have a new party to vote for ......so it's utterly suicidal to push forward when the consequences of losing that next election will be calamity

Starmer and Reeves and their ilk will just wipe out any opposition for a few brownie points that won't interest the reform surge

Thatcher thought her poll tax was for the good of the country .....best direction etc .......

Good luck if you think some kind of pseudo balance sheet approach is what's needed.....and in this case , if it ever were

[Eric Cartman]

Re: Runcorn by election.

I have told you several times what policies are clearly going to sink the labour party , you must be either incredibly dull or being deliberately stupid if you are saying you are not aware what those are

Rachel Reeves and Liz Kendal are responsible for implementing policies which have caused huge mistrust and have stabbed in the back those that voted Labour in

Now you can go on about reducing public spending , the benefits bill , welfare till you are Blue in the face .....sic .....but at a time when labour needs every vote it can get as reform flexes it's muscles what labour have done is shot itself in the foot to appease the right wing .....who we now know have a new party to vote for ......so it's utterly suicidal to push forward when the consequences of losing that next election will be calamity

Starmer and Reeves and their ilk will just wipe out any opposition for a few brownie points that won't interest the reform surge

Thatcher thought her poll tax was for the good of the country .....best direction etc .......

Good luck if you think some kind of pseudo balance sheet approach is what's needed.....and in this case , if it ever were

I didn't ask what will sink them, I asked what you thought. If death camps polled well would you be in favour of them because it keeps reform out?

Fundamentally I don't think a universal winter fuel allowance is right.

I am less convinced about the benefits changes but the numbers/direction are pretty clearly unsustainable.

[SLUDGE FACTORY]

Re: Runcorn by election.

I didn't ask what will sink them, I asked what you thought. If death camps polled well would you be in favour of them because it keeps reform out?

Fundamentally I don't think a universal winter fuel allowance is right.

I am less convinced about the benefits changes but the numbers/direction are pretty clearly unsustainable.

No universal benefits and allowances are right but starmer royally screwed up and his stubbornness over the matter shows how out of touch he is

You don't get people on side by making it more difficult for disabled people to live

To reduce fraud and waste you employ more fraud teams not put the vulnerable through more and more scrutiny till they stop living

If the amount provided is to be reduced or frozen for someone in a wheelchair on the grounds that at present the economy can't cope then that's a concensus many people could deal with

If proposals were genuinely to support people into part time work or in some cases full employment then again that could be a winner

But this sort of we will help those genuinely ill or disabled , we will target funding etc etc is just a cover to hack away, it's absolute bullshit

You have been reading too much propaganda

[Dorcus]

Re: Runcorn by election.

I didn't ask what will sink them, I asked what you thought. If death camps polled well would you be in favour of them because it keeps reform out?

Fundamentally I don't think a universal winter fuel allowance is right.

I am less convinced about the benefits changes but the numbers/direction are pretty clearly unsustainable.

I absolutely don't think a universal winter fuel allowance is right. In my opinion it should be strictly means tested. However in this case I think for the sake of saving a relatively small amount of money Labour have shot themselves in the foot.

I think Labour could have made the case very well for not squandering money on people who don't need it while caring for those that do by curtailing the payment for the more well off but keeping it for the average Joe. By not raising the threshold to a more reasonable level before stopping the WFA they have managed to alienate a large core of voters. They could have achieved a massive propaganda hit if they had handled the issue with more intelligence.

[Heathblue]

Re: Runcorn by election.

I didn't ask what will sink them, I asked what you thought. If death camps polled well would you be in favour of them because it keeps reform out?

Fundamentally I don't think a universal winter fuel allowance is right.

I am less convinced about the benefits changes but the numbers/direction are pretty clearly unsustainable.

You make a good debate but are trying to reason with someone who is still fixated with someone who lost power 34 years ago !!! And when she came to power wasn't old enough to vote.

[SLUDGE FACTORY]

Re: Runcorn by election.

You make a good debate but are trying to reason with someone who is still fixated with someone who lost power 34 years ago !!! And when she came to power wasn't old enough to vote.

Coming from someone fixated by right wing creeps but still playing the deserving working class violin that's irony on a massive scale

Have you got your farage trump world tour t shirt yet ?

[SLUDGE FACTORY]

Re: Runcorn by election.

I absolutely don't think a universal winter fuel allowance is right. In my opinion it should be strictly means tested. However in this case I think for the sake of saving a relatively small amount of money Labour have shot themselves in the foot.

I think Labour could have made the case very well for not squandering money on people who don't need it while caring for those that do by curtailing the payment for the more well off but keeping it for the average Joe. By not raising the threshold to a more reasonable level before stopping the WFA they have managed to alienate a large core of voters. They could have achieved a massive propaganda hit if they had handled the issue with more intelligence.

That's about right

The farage crew have a new party so it's pointless skirting around with policy to appease them

The issue of public spending has been handled so badly it's as if it's been thought out on the back of a fag packet

It's not a case of either we slash spending and if we don't the country goes to hell in a handcart

[Dorcus]

Re: Runcorn by election.

Coming from someone fixated by right wing creeps but still playing the deserving working class violin that's irony on a massive scale

Have you got your farage trump world tour t shirt yet ?

The big London gig is at Buck Pal with Charlie boy. I'll give it a miss myself but do you know the rest of the lineup? I wonder if Kemi is Bad Enough to be included? Personally I think she is.

[Eric Cartman]

Re: Runcorn by election.

I absolutely don't think a universal winter fuel allowance is right. In my opinion it should be strictly means tested. However in this case I think for the sake of saving a relatively small amount of money Labour have shot themselves in the foot.

I think Labour could have made the case very well for not squandering money on people who don't need it while caring for those that do by curtailing the payment for the more well off but keeping it for the average Joe. By not raising the threshold to a more reasonable level before stopping the WFA they have managed to alienate a large core of voters. They could have achieved a massive propaganda hit if they had handled the issue with more intelligence.

Its about perception though, 25% of pensioners live in a household with net worth north of a million so who is the 'average Joe' when it comes to policies like this? I agree though that the comms were god awful though, they first tried to say they 'didnt want to do it but had to in order to save money', which then was questioned as it being linked to pension credit meant more people signing up to that and any savings being wiped out.

The net result is a better targeted benefit (putting aside whether the threshold is set high enough, which is certainly worth it's own debate), distributing more of the pot to the very worst off pensioners and taking away a benefit from the best off. But because of Comms labour have left themselves not really able to point to that as a success because their stated aim was to save money.

Might be flippant but I would ask the mail and the sun where all the frozen corpses are being stored because thousands were going to die because of the change apparently, but they this is the political landscape right now, bombastic rhetoric over sane debate.

[Dorcus]

Re: Runcorn by election.

Its about perception though, 25% of pensioners live in a household with net worth north of a million so who is the 'average Joe' when it comes to policies like this? I agree though that the comms were god awful though, they first tried to say they 'didnt want to do it but had to in order to save money', which then was questioned as it being linked to pension credit meant more people signing up to that and any savings being wiped out.

The net result is a better targeted benefit (putting aside whether the threshold is set high enough, which is certainly worth it's own debate), distributing more of the pot to the very worst off pensioners and taking away a benefit from the best off. But because of Comms labour have left themselves not really able to point to that as a success because their stated aim was to save money.

Might be flippant but I would ask the mail and the sun where all the frozen corpses are being stored because thousands were going to die because of the change apparently, but they this is the political landscape right now, bombastic rhetoric over sane debate.

Agree with your last paragraph and many are gullible enough to believe it 👍

[JamesWales]

Re: Runcorn by election.

Agree with your last paragraph and many are gullible enough to believe it 👍

We've had that shite for years and years and through all of the austerity years.

Boris murdered pensioners, Theresa May's dementia tax, Blair killer British troops etc etc.. Such bombastic rhetoric is as old as politics itself.

I agree, it's stupid.

[SLUDGE FACTORY]

Re: Runcorn by election.

We've had that shite for years and years and through all of the austerity years.

Boris murdered pensioners, Theresa May's dementia tax, Blair killer British troops etc etc.. Such bombastic rhetoric is as old as politics itself.

I agree, it's stupid.

To be fair Blair absolutely lied about wmd and sent young men to their deaths

[JamesWales]

Re: Runcorn by election.

After the shock of Runcorn, a good and slightly surprising win for Labour yesterday. I looked at the odds and SNP were hot favouurites

[jon1959]

Re: Runcorn by election.

After the shock of Runcorn, a good and slightly surprising win for Labour yesterday. I looked at the odds and SNP were hot favouurites

From what I have read - and from informed podcasts in the last week - this is a surprising and narrow win for Scottish Labour.

Starmer was kept well away from the campaign. He didn't visit once.

The pre-election polling showed that he and Reeves are not electoral assets in Scotland! The opposite.