The Donald Trump thread

[the other bob wilson]

Re: The Donald Trump thread

Just in case there is any one in the world who is unaware of this, this man is the President of the USA

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-45913921

[Wales-Bales]

Re: The Donald Trump thread

Ah, I see, Watergate and the Iran Contra affair were justice department productions then, helped along by the Clinton's and Obama presumably.

It goes back a long way.

[the other bob wilson]

Re: The Donald Trump thread

It goes back a long way.

Jeez, you do think Watergate was a globalist plot, your one-eyedness knows no bounds!

Surprised that you, almost uniquely when it comes to Trump, decided not to comment on what he had to say about the assault on the Guardian reporter by a Republican Congressman.

[Wales-Bales]

Re: The Donald Trump thread

Jeez, you do think Watergate was a globalist plot, your one-eyedness knows no bounds!

Surprised that you, almost uniquely when it comes to Trump, decided not to comment on what he had to say about the assault on the Guardian reporter by a Republican Congressman.

Globalism goes back to 1884, maybe earlier, but you were talking about the justifice department regarding Watergate.

[the other bob wilson]

Re: The Donald Trump thread

Globalism goes back to 1884, maybe earlier, but you were talking about the justification department regarding Watergate.

It goes back much further than that, but that's hardly the point here is it.

[Wales-Bales]

Re: The Donald Trump thread

It goes back much further than that, but that's hardly the point here is it.

The point is the justice department, law enforcement, intelligence agencies, the federal government, and the media, etc..

[the other bob wilson]

Re: The Donald Trump thread

The point is the justice department, law enforcement, intelligence agencies, the federal government, and the media, etc..

The point as far as I'm concerned is your apparent belief that the wrong people were blamed for Watergate.

[Wales-Bales]

Re: The Donald Trump thread

The point as far as I'm concerned is your apparent belief that the wrong people were blamed for Watergate.

You mentioned Watergate not me. I've said nothing about it.

[the other bob wilson]

Re: The Donald Trump thread

You mentioned Watergate not me. I've said nothing about it.

The table I posted showed far more convictions under the Nixon and Reagan Presidencies than any others over the past fifty years - Watergate and the Iran Contra affair happened under their watch and, surely, must account for the majority of those convictions, your response to that table was to say a cryptic "it goes back a long way" - how is your comment relevant to what I posted?

[Wales-Bales]

Re: The Donald Trump thread

The table I posted showed far more convictions under the Nixon and Reagan Presidencies than any others over the past fifty years - Watergate and the Iran Contra affair happened under their watch and, surely, must account for the majority of those convictions, your response to that table was to say a cryptic "it goes back a long way" - how is your comment relevant to what I posted?

Law enforcement has been suspect since the days of J. Edgar Hoover, and if you add in CIA black ops nothing is as it appears. The role of the DOJ is to decide who to go after and who to let off, so your chart also tells a secondary story.

[cyril evans awaydays]

Re: The Donald Trump thread

Law enforcement has been suspect since the days of J. Edgar Hoover, and if you add in CIA black ops nothing is as it appears. The role of the DOJ is to decide who to go after and who to let off, so your chart also tells a secondary story.

These would be the same government agencies that decided to publicise a few weeks before the 2016 Presidential election that they were reopening the examination of Hilary Clinton's use of a private server whilst witholding the fact that they were undertaking a formal investigation into links between Russia and the Trump campaign I suppose.

Seems like you can use sweeping statements to support any point you want to (or expose the frailty of them).

[Wales-Bales]

Re: The Donald Trump thread

These would be the same government agencies that decided to publicise a few weeks before the 2016 Presidential election that they were reopening the examination of Hilary Clinton's use of a private server whilst witholding the fact that they were undertaking a formal investigation into links between Russia and the Trump campaign I suppose.

Seems like you can use sweeping statements to support any point you want to (or expose the frailty of them).

You really are like a dog with a bone lately

[lardy]

Re: The Donald Trump thread

Trump sided with Putin and Russia over US intelligence.
Trump sided with Saudi Arabia over US intelligence.

Trump has deep and unexplained financial ties with Russia and Saudi Arabia.

Coincidence I expect. Draining the swamp Trump style #7,444

[Wales-Bales]

Re: The Donald Trump thread

Trump sided with Putin and Russia over US intelligence.
Trump sided with Saudi Arabia over US intelligence.

Trump has deep and unexplained financial ties with Russia and Saudi Arabia.

Coincidence I expect. Draining the swamp Trump style #7,444

Who did Obama side with?

Is the Steele dossier your source for Trump having deep and unexplained financial ties with Russia by any chance?