The Donald Trump thread

[lardy]

Re: The Donald Trump thread

They bus all those rent-a-mobs to wherever the action is, they also have offices in New York and Washington DC

So you'll have some better proof than "same country" right?

[City123]

Re: The Donald Trump thread

It's not a simple question

So I guess those dead kids were paid actors as well? And the "grieving parents" were Oscar nominees?

Denying a mass murder just so you can fit your anti "mainstream media" narrative and can peddle this right wing conspiracy theorist bullshit is mental

[Wales-Bales]

Re: The Donald Trump thread

So I guess those dead kids were paid actors as well? And the "grieving parents" were Oscar nominees?

Denying a mass murder just so you can fit your anti "mainstream media" narrative and can peddle this right wing conspiracy theorist bullshit is mental

In case you haven't been following the thread, it was an expert in phychological operations and false flags who called it out, a person who btw carried out these kinds of operations on behalf of 4 previous US presidents. So in the grand scheme of things, who am I to doubt the veracity of his words?

And as per usual, you resort to personal attacks when trying to make something align with your own personal beliefs. It's called confirmation bias, and it is easily cured by simply opening your eyes

[CardiffIrish2]

Re: The Donald Trump thread

In case you haven't been following the thread, it was an expert in phychological operations and false flags who called it out, a person who btw carried out these kinds of operations on behalf of 4 previous US presidents. So in the grand scheme of things, who am I to doubt the veracity of his words?

And as per usual, you resort to personal attacks when trying to make something align with your own personal beliefs. It's called confirmation bias, and it is easily cured by simply opening your eyes

He may be all the things you say and no doubt he is a clever person.

But he's completely and utterly wide of the mark to the point of causing gross offence.

I can't believe there are deniers of this, is utterly insane to suggest that Sandyhook didn't happen.

[Wales-Bales]

Re: The Donald Trump thread

He may be all the things you say and no doubt he is a clever person.

But he's completely and utterly wide of the mark to the point of causing gross offence.

I can't believe there are deniers of this, is utterly insane to suggest that Sandyhook didn't happen.

I am not in a position to come to a definative conclusion one way or the other, and I get your point about causing gross offence, but if any of these attrocities are ever proven to be false flags there will be a huge meltdown amonst the general population. It would be a gross offence against people's intelligence and a catastrophic breach of trust.

Unfortunately, if Trump does ever get hold of this kind of info, I think he is going to use it at some point judging by his demeanour and his body language.

[Wales-Bales]

Re: The Donald Trump thread

This is a bit awkward, but shall we give the school caretaker the benefit of the doubt, and put it all down to a case of bad nerves when speaking in public?

[City123]

Re: The Donald Trump thread

In case you haven't been following the thread, it was an expert in phychological operations and false flags who called it out, a person who btw carried out these kinds of operations on behalf of 4 previous US presidents. So in the grand scheme of things, who am I to doubt the veracity of his words?

And as per usual, you resort to personal attacks when trying to make something align with your own personal beliefs. It's called confirmation bias, and it is easily cured by simply opening your eyes

Just because someone is an expert at something doesn't mean they're 100% right all the time, what he said was grotesque and I'd say arguing that the 3rd largest mass-shooting in US history never happened at best makes him an unreliable source and at worst makes him a complete lunatic

"Personal attack"? Really? Is saying that its mental that you'd deny a mass murder really a "personal attack"?

If anyone has their "eyes shut" here it's you. Evidence has been provided by many in this thread and yet you refuse to accept it as it doesn't fit into your anti "mainstream media" viewpoint

There's also plenty of evidence out there to show Sandy Hook was open and the "school wasn't in operation" theory has been debunked, unfortunately Sandy Hook did happen, its way too big of a tragedy to not have happened

[Wales-Bales]

Re: The Donald Trump thread

"Personal attack"? Really? Is saying that its mental that you'd deny a mass murder really a "personal attack"?

Well I haven't denied anything have I, so I guess that makes you a little bit mental for trying to say that I have

And what evidence has been provided by many in this thread? It's mostly hearsay, anonymous sources and conjecture.

[Sgt. Pepper]

Re: The Donald Trump thread

No forget all that, let's listen to lardy instead, the oracle of all truth, the world expert on everything. lardy speaks, we listen

Replace the word 'lardy' with any other person who has an opinion to voice - including yourself.
Some might say - particularly yourself.

[Sgt. Pepper]

Re: The Donald Trump thread

Well I haven't denied anything have I, so I guess that makes you a little bit mental for trying to say that I have

And what evidence has been provided by many in this thread? It's mostly hearsay, anonymous sources and conjecture.

Well, that's pretty much all anyone drags on the the table, and that includes all of us. You too.

[Wales-Bales]

Re: The Donald Trump thread

Well, that's pretty much all anyone drags on the the table, and that includes all of us. You too.

I though it was a discussion forum? I've always said we need to wait for things to be proved one way or the other. There are the MSM version of events, and also the alternative media view of everything. Who will come out on top? Watch this space, but I did correctly state many months ago that the Russian hacking story would be a nothingburger

[Wales-Bales]

Re: The Donald Trump thread

Replace the word 'lardy' with any other person who has an opinion to voice - including yourself.
Some might say - particularly yourself.

So far I haven't said anything that's been shown to be incorrect. If I am wrong about something I will own up to it. Things are still finely balanced, but there will be winners and losers in this Trumpathon.

[Sgt. Pepper]

Re: The Donald Trump thread

I though it was a discussion forum? I've always said we need to wait for things to be proved one way or the other. There are the MSM version of events, and also the alternative media view of everything. Who will come out on top? Watch this space, but I did correctly state many months ago that the Russian hacking story would be a nothingburger

I think we all get that this is a discussion forum, but ta .. :D

Some of your points are interesting and some will be true and tested, but you really do give the impression that you believe yourself to be the sole keeper of the light. And everybody else is a bit dopey.
And as observed before, clearly it is very, very important to you to be 'right'. As for your statement above- yeah right! - If you are wrong about something you will wriggle and bluster like you always do!

[Wales-Bales]

Re: The Donald Trump thread

Justice demands 1.3M IP addresses related to Trump resistance site

http://thehill.com/policy/cybersecurity/346544-dreamhost-claims-doj-requesting-info-on-visitors-to-anti-trump-website