£2BN Per Month

[Tito Fuente]

Re: £2BN Per Month

I don’t need to discuss it , the evidence is there , otherwise how have 97% of the UK population developed antibodies and how come the most cautious people I know (who advocate them)have caught it , some more than 3 times ?

That's because there isn't a 100% effective way of preventing the spread of the virus and millions have had the virus and millions of people have been vaccinated.

Quite easy explanations to give.

Like yesterday, I'm not sure I understand your point any longer.

We've gone from "masks do not stop aerosols" to "do your own research" to "97% of the UK population developed antibodies".

I don't mean to be rude but you're not arguing your case well at all. Your evidence, it appears, is just anecdotal evidence. That's not going to cut it when discussing scientific reasoning.

Masks have proven to be massively effective in the reduction of the spread of aerosols, but they aren't 100% effective. Literally nobody has ever claimed that they are.

Were there any new developments on the Covid/Moderna links by the way?

[TWGL1]

Re: £2BN Per Month

That's because there isn't a 100% effective way of preventing the spread of the virus and millions have had the virus and millions of people have been vaccinated.

Quite easy explanations to give.

Like yesterday, I'm not sure I understand your point any longer.

We've gone from "masks do not stop aerosols" to "do your own research" to "97% of the UK population developed antibodies".

I don't mean to be rude but you're not arguing your case well at all. Your evidence, it appears, is just anecdotal evidence. That's not going to cut it when discussing scientific reasoning.

Masks have proven to be massively effective in the reduction of the spread of aerosols, but they aren't 100% effective. Literally nobody has ever claimed that they are.

Were there any new developments on the Covid/Moderna links by the way?

There is plenty of evidence that is slowly becoming available , probably because many eminent people are now being listened to. As always , you don’t have to agree , and your opinion is as important as mine. From my perspective why weren’t cartoon masks made illegal ?

[Tito Fuente]

Re: £2BN Per Month

There is plenty of evidence that is slowly becoming available , probably because many eminent people are now being listened to. As always , you don’t have to agree , and your opinion is as important as mine.

This is where you're just wrong.

I don't have an opinion. You do.

The scientific fact is that masks reduce outward emissions and you are choosing to ignore that and base your beliefs on whatever you want to be true.

You asked me to do my research but can't provide anything to counter the evidence I provided.

It's a dangerous place to be when we are discussing proven scientific fact as an opinion.

The earth isn't flat. People who think it is are categorically wrong. That's not an opinion. This mask situation is exactly the same.

[TWGL1]

Re: £2BN Per Month

We are going around in circles …. I’m sure more and more evidence which supports my view will become apparent….. you must accept that there are many many studies that reflect my viewpoint


With regards to Modena, there is loads of stuff on other media platforms ,scroll down the link.

https://twitter.com/perpetualmaniac/status/1497107545059520512?s=21

[Tito Fuente]

Re: £2BN Per Month

We are going around in circles …. I’m sure more and more evidence which supports my view will become apparent….. you must accept that there are many many studies that reflect my viewpoint


With regards to Modena, there is loads of stuff on other media platforms ,scroll down the link.

https://twitter.com/perpetualmaniac/...059520512?s=21

Share one study that reflects your incorrect viewpoint and then, perhaps, we can stop going around in circles.

Saying more and more evidence will come out to support your viewpoint is, frankly, nonsense.

I could say that about anything I want to believe in that is categorically untrue.

I am still none the wiser on the Moderna/Covid thing. I'll wait for more and more evidence to come out and then see if it makes sense.

[TWGL1]

Re: £2BN Per Month

Share one study that reflects your incorrect viewpoint and then, perhaps, we can stop going around in circles.

Saying more and more evidence will come out to support your viewpoint is, frankly, nonsense.

I could say that about anything I want to believe in that is categorically untrue.

I am still none the wiser on the Moderna/Covid thing. I'll wait for more and more evidence to come out and then see if it makes sense.

Did you open the link ,and listen to the interview ? (And read the comments )

[TWGL1]

Re: £2BN Per Month

Share one study that reflects your incorrect viewpoint and then, perhaps, we can stop going around in circles.

Saying more and more evidence will come out to support your viewpoint is, frankly, nonsense.

I could say that about anything I want to believe in that is categorically untrue.

I am still none the wiser on the Moderna/Covid thing. I'll wait for more and more evidence to come out and then see if it makes sense.

Masks should be used as part of a comprehensive strategy of measures to suppress transmission and save lives; the use of a mask alone is not sufficient to provide an adequate level of protection against COVID-19. That is on the internet so clearly not nonsense is it ?

[Tito Fuente]

Re: £2BN Per Month

Did you open the link ,and listen to the interview ? (And read the comments )

What interview?

The woman asked him one question and he answered it by not really answering it at all.

Sorry, I'm not going to read random Twitter comments to get an understanding of something. If that's what you are doing then I'm beginning to understand why you have some of the beliefs that you've shared on here.

You might as well go on the Daily Mail comments section to get an understanding of immigration and the benefits system.

[Tito Fuente]

Re: £2BN Per Month

Masks should be used as part of a comprehensive strategy of measures to suppress transmission and save lives; the use of a mask alone is not sufficient to provide an adequate level of protection against COVID-19. That is on the tinternet

Hence the vaccines, social distancing, "lockdowns" and the numerous other measures we've seen other than just "the use of a mask alone".

You've just done a 180 and decided that your original argument to be wrong. Impressive stuff.

[Tito Fuente]

Re: £2BN Per Month

Enjoy your evening TWG1.

[TWGL1]

Re: £2BN Per Month

What interview?

The woman asked him one question and he answered it by not really answering it at all.

Sorry, I'm not going to read random Twitter comments to get an understanding of something. If that's what you are doing then I'm beginning to understand why you have some of the beliefs that you've shared on here.

You might as well go on the Daily Mail comments section to get an understanding of immigration and the benefits system.

Are you an epidemiologist then or just a Cardiff fan in a discussion with a fellow Cardiff fan with a different opinion on a football messageboard?

You may as well tune into the BBC

[Eric Cartman]

Re: £2BN Per Month

I’m sure more and more evidence which supports my view will become apparent

“He uses statistics as a drunken man uses lamp-posts... for support rather than illumination.”

[lardy]

Re: £2BN Per Month

I don’t need to discuss it , the evidence is there , otherwise how have 97% of the UK population developed antibodies and how come the most cautious people I know (who advocate them)have caught it , some more than 3 times ?

Are you saying that you know people that have caught covid FOUR times?

[TWGL1]

Re: £2BN Per Month

Care to comment on this?

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-72798-7

Where's your source for your statement "masks do not stop aerosols"?

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-10565993/Cloth-masks-allow-90-particles-filter-giving-little-ability-prevent-Covid.html

[Tito Fuente]

Re: £2BN Per Month

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/a...ent-Covid.html

Do you bother reading past the headlines? That says "cloth masks". Your standpoint has been "masks don't stop aerosols" and now you're providing evidence that says even putting a piece of cloth over your face will stop 10% of aerosols